Advertisement

Nunes memo vs. Schiff memo: what’s the difference?

Click to play video: 'Trump dismisses Democrat memo' Trump dismisses Democrat memo
WATCH ABOVE: Trump dismisses Democrat memo – Feb 24, 2018

Over the last month, Republican and Democratic members of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee have released separate memos on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.

The first document which was written by Devin Nunes, the Republican House Intelligence chairman, was released by Feb. 2. It implied that the FBI and Justice Department had acted improperly when it sought FISA warrants in order to surveil Donald Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

READ MORE: Trump, GOP House chairman dismiss Democrat memo defending Russia investigation

A FISA warrant is obtained in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court behind closed doors and allows agencies to monitor foreign spies who are operating within the U.S. The proceedings are held behind closed doors due to the sensitive nature fo the warrants, however, the judges in these proceedings rarely turn down warrant requests.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: Democrats slam Trump for blocking release of memo

Click to play video: 'Democrats slam Trump for blocking release of memo' Democrats slam Trump for blocking release of memo
Democrats slam Trump for blocking release of memo – Feb 10, 2018

The crux of the argument in the Nunes memo was that the FBI and Justice Department had left out some important information when applying for the FISA warrant to monitor Page.

It states the warrant used info from a dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele as a basis for the wiretaps but had failed to note that Steele, who was working for a company called Fusion GPS, had been hired by an agency connected to the Clinton campaign to dig up dirt on Trump.

READ MORE: Democrat memo defends handling of Russia investigation by FBI, Robert Mueller

Nunes’ memo said the lack of disclosure points to the political motivations of the FBI and DOJ and also tarnishes the investigation.

Story continues below advertisement

The Democrats’ memo, which was written by Adam Schiff and released this past Saturday, argues that the Nunes memo cherry-picked information it used in its memo.

Their memo argues that while the FBI and DOJ did use information from the Steele dossier to obtain the warrant, the DOJ used a multi-pronged approach involving multiple sources to obtain the warrants.

WATCH: Trump blocks release of Democratic Russia memo

Click to play video: 'Trump blocks release of Democratic Russia memo' Trump blocks release of Democratic Russia memo
Trump blocks release of Democratic Russia memo – Feb 10, 2018

The second memo also says the government agencies did indeed let the judges know that “Steele was hired by politically-motivated U.S. persons and entities and that his research appeared intended for use ‘to discredit’ Trump’s campaign.”

It also points out that three separate judges approved the warrants, and the fact that Steele was a known and trusted FBI source.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Donald Trump says ‘Little Adam Schiff’ ‘must be stopped’ after GOP memo response

The Republican memo also suggests information about former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr should have been disclosed to the FISA court.

Ohr was the DOJ contact at Fusion GPS, the firm which employed Steele as well as Ohr’s wife Nellie.

The memo states “in September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he ‘was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not, being president.’”

WATCH: Trump says Republican memo vindicates him in Russia probe

Click to play video: 'Trump says Republican memo vindicates him in Russia probe' Trump says Republican memo vindicates him in Russia probe
Trump says Republican memo vindicates him in Russia probe – Feb 3, 2018

The document says this points to the clear bias in Steele’s work. It also notes that the relationship between the Ohrs and Fusion GPS was also not presented in the FISA applications.

Story continues below advertisement

The Schiff memo counters the other document’s reference to Ohr is “misleading” and overstates the importance of Ohr’s dealings with both Steele and the FlSA process.

The Schiff memo says, “The Majority describes Bruce Ohr as a senior DOJ official who ‘worked closely with the Deputy Attorney General, [Sally] Yates and later [Rod] Rosenstein,’ in order to imply that Ohr was somehow involved in the FlSA process, but there is no indication this is the case.”

– With files from Associated Press

 

 

Sponsored content