Hundreds in the south Edmonton communities of Duggan and Rideau Park have taken legal action they hope will restrict what can and cannot be built in their neighbourhoods.
They say current city infill policies have forced them to enter a restrictive covenant to limit infills in their communities.
“They don’t want one of these six, seven or eight or bigger multiplexes built in the neighbourhood,” said Greg Schmaltz, one of the people who organized the signing.
“Up until two days ago, we had 293 people that had registered and paid and so they’re expected either today or Sunday.”
The 20-year covenant sets constraints on any future redevelopment of properties that buy in. The limits include building a single-family home that could include either a basement suite, or a garden or garage suite. A height limit of eight metres and one parking spot per dwelling are also included in the covenant.
It also limits builds to duplexes with no additional units allowed. The changes would mean less infill, and a smaller pool of potential buyers if owners choose to sell. This is a concern for advocates of infill development.
Get breaking National news
“For communities to go straight to just using restrictive covenant in response to infill, we know that there are some long-term restrictions that can be associated with using those tools,” said Stephan Raitz, vice-president of policy and advocacy for BILD Edmonton Metro.
“What we’d really hope for is that community, industry, and the city are able to come together to make the infill process as positive as possible.”
Homeowners waiting in line to sign feel it is worth it, and say the cost of paying $210 is a small price to pay.
- New Brunswick needs to better protect clean drinking water, residents say
- Former GM site in Ontario given 120-day cleanup deadline after appeal fails
- Saskatchewan group advocates for accessibility — starting in their neighbourhood
- Toddler bitten in the face by coyote at Whitby, Ont., playground: police
.jpg?h=article-hero-560-keepratio&w=article-hero-small-keepratio&crop=1&quality=70&strip=all)
“The amount of parking, garbages, traffic on the street, it just disrupts a quiet neighbourhood. Duggan, Rideau Park, they’re all very quiet neighbourhoods and we don’t want these infills.” said Diane Pechler, who signed with her mother.
“These contractors are coming, they’re buying one, two, three, four houses in a row to build these big complexes and it’s just not right. It just seems like the people don’t have a say and we have to take legal action.”
Cathy Claughton has called the Duggan neighbourhood home for over 30 years. “We were talking in the lineup today about overnight suddenly next door to you, there’s an infill and it’s blocking your sunlight and the building is going on with nobody having any idea this was going to happen,” she said.
“Having these infills come in affects the quality of life and the whole issue is dividing neighbours, which I’m sure was never the intent but that is what’s happening and I find that really problematic.”
Global News reached out to Ward papstew councillor Michael Janz, but did not receive a response. Community members hope their actions get the attention of city hall in what continues to be a divisive issue.
“I just hope that people continue to reach out and that city hall starts working a little closer with the communities,” said Claughton.
At every town hall on this subject, the majority have voted against this insane policy. Have no fear, Knack and this far-left council will push it through regardless of what the people want.
Grandview Heights did that a month ago. Inserting eight to twelve housing units on a single lot on a residential street compounded with no off street parking is corruption and has nothing to do with affordable housing.
To Notia, we ALL struggled to buy homes even back in the 70’s when we had to ask our parents for a LOAN to put a down payment on our first house and salaries have skyrocketed since those days when we made $425.00 A MONTH. How much do you make a month today Notia? Bet that it is NOT $425.00 A MONTH. Bet that it is way more then that.
IF the full time city council had nothing to do like changing rules and making ridiculous laws that affect us all – and increase our house taxes ALL THE TIME – like all the road construction that they all approved for the next 3 years they would ALL BE OUT OF THEIR HIGHLY PAID JOBS. We taxpayers honestly DO NOT NEED FULL TIME council at all so how do we go back to the days of PART TIME COUNCIL before a certain LAWYER changed their status because HE was unable to do both so he choose to make council full time so HE would not lose any money by becoming a full time council person.
Imagine if all three levels of government got the hell out of the way and we went back to the 1960s where a developer could buy land from a farmer at the edge of a city and build houses that people actually wanted.
O no, the boomers are afraid of affordable housing and the rest of us potentially getting a taste of ownership. We should totally let these 300 people dictate suburban development policy during one of the largest housing and wealth inequality crisis ever, because its inconvenient for them that other people want what you could get in the 80’s as a butcher with a family and now family’s with double incomes can barely afford food let alone the pride of homeownership but forget everyone else, u got yours right.
GOOD FOR YOU PEOPLE. ENOUGH OF BEING IGNORED. THE GOVERNMENT JUST DOES WHAT THEY WANT AND TO HELL WITH WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT