Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday reaffirmed Canada’s support for U.S. and Israeli efforts to eliminate Iran’s nuclear and terrorist threats, but added it was a position taken “with regret” and suggested the decision to attack Iran was “inconsistent with international law.”
Speaking to reporters in Canberra, Australia, during his three-country international trip, Carney said the growing Middle East conflict “is another example of the failure of the international order” that he warned about in his widely-watched speech in Davos in January.
“We support efforts to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and to prevent its regime from further threatening international peace and security,” he said. “Because Canada is taking the world as it is, not passively waiting for a world we wish to be.
“We do, however, take this position with regret because the current conflict is another example of the failure of the international order,” Carney continued.
He particularly noted the failure of the U.S. and Israel to engage with the United Nations or allies “including Canada” before attacking Iran on Saturday.
“We were not informed in advance. We were not asked to participate. Prima facia, it appears that these actions are inconsistent with international law,” he said.
“We took a position because we view the nuclear threat and the export of terrorism of Iran over decades as one of the greatest threats to international peace and security. … In that limited sense, we supported that aspect.
Get daily National news
“That is not a blank cheque,” Carney continued. “That is not us participating, that is not us asking for something in exchange for that — none of that is true. That is just a straight-up position.”
The Trump administration has offered shifting explanations for launching the war against Iran alongside Israel. While it has cited the regime’s nuclear ambitions and missile program as threats, it has yet to clearly demonstrate whether Iran was on the verge of attacking its allies in the Middle East or Europe.
U.S. President Donald Trump has openly called for regime change, although those calls have stopped since the weekend, and there was confusion Tuesday over whether Israel or Iran was planning to attack the other first.
Carney confirmed he did not view Iran’s nuclear program as an “imminent threat,” but said an Iran armed with a nuclear weapon “would be the biggest threat” and again cited the regime’s support for terrorism and multiple failed international attempts to end the program.
“Nobody has a civil nuclear program that’s buried a mile beneath the desert. So that is a threat,” he said. “The exact timing of it, the exact aspect of it, I’m not privy to all the information in terms of that.”
Although he condemned Iran’s strikes on neighbouring Gulf nations that have hit civilian infrastructure and killed civilians, he did not similarly criticize the U.S. and Israeli strikes, instead imploring “all parties” to “respect the rules of international engagement.”
“Canada calls for a rapid de-escalation of hostilities and is prepared to assist in achieving this goal,” he added.
“Resolution of this crisis will require commitment to a broader political solution, and diplomatic engagement is essential to avoid a wider and deeper conflict. Innocent civilians must be protected, and all parties must commit to finding enduring agreements to end both nuclear proliferation and terrorist extremism. Canada will pursue this approach with like-minded countries and participants in the conflict.”
Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand said during an event at the Toronto Board of Trade earlier Tuesday that Canada’s approach was rooted in “pragmatism” and was focused on the safety of the roughly 100,000 Canadians in the region, as well as protecting civilian lives.
“The situation is fluid,” she said. “Our understanding is, and was at the time, that the intention (of the U.S.-Israeli strikes) was to address that nuclear threat.
“At the same time, we want a diplomatic resolution.”
It was much overdue for this to happen, we should stand fully behind Trump and Bibi, finally the people of Persia can be free of the maniac regime and may lasting peace be achieved in the middle east for years to come!
Mark Anders comment below shows the ignorance of the anti-Israel leftists – you don’t think that Israel could have turned Gaza in a parking lot in one week if they wanted to? They’re making every effort not to hurt civilians. Iran on the other hand seems to have no problem firing missles at their Arab neighbours. If Iran had Israel’s military the nukes would have been launched long ago.
Understood
Stuff one of Trudeau’s socks in it Carney .
“With Regret”. What a whiny,sapsucking statement ,grow a pair ,for crying out loud,Whimp.
Damned if your pro
Damned if your anti
Damned if your in between
and Damned if you say nothing
Like a fish out of water Carney flip flops so much that we never know if he is doing it out of desperation or if he waits to see which way the political winds are blowing. In any event he is a weak leader.
As usual a nicely tossed word salad…
Very sad that you seem to be taken in by the same old story about Iran. Do you realize what a fatwa is. Iran would never have sought nuclear weapons under Ayatolla Ali Khamenei. As supreme leader, Khamenei supported Iran’s nuclear program for civilian use while issuing a fatwa forbidding the production of weapons of mass destruction. You would rather believe a disgusting known liar like Trump than a man of religious principles.
Israel kills tens of thousands and HAS A NUKE program…but Iran is the threat? And their prime minister is a WAR CRIMINAL????
Yet more virtue signalling from Carney, did he not learn anything froom his Davos speech mocking the US. Carney would be better served dealing with Canadian problems and actually doing something at home instead of travelling the world at the tax payers expense chasing imaginary trade deals.
I am very surprised that Prime minister Carneys voice is not to octaves higher due to the severe “fence sitting and shifting from no to yes and yes to no”
Had Canada been consulted the world would be dithering for years on this necessary action.
The principal, ongoing source of conflict is the attempt by western nations to enforce a verbal land deal allegedly made 6,000 years ago by a wandering tribe with a spirit-being named Yahweh.