Two Nova Scotia men are appealing a judge’s dismissal of their court challenge of then-prime minister Justin Trudeau’s move to prorogue Parliament earlier this year.
David MacKinnon and Aris Lavranos had asked the Federal Court to declare the suspension of Parliament illegal because there must be a “reasonable justification” for hitting the pause button.
They sought an order setting aside Trudeau’s January decision to advise Gov. Gen. Mary Simon to exercise her power to prorogue Parliament until March 24.
Get daily National news
Federal lawyers argued that Trudeau’s advice to Simon was not subject to review by the courts and that the ultimate decision rests with the voting public.
In a ruling last month, Federal Court Chief Justice Paul Crampton said the courts do have a role to play in reviewing the prime minister’s advice to the Governor General and they should fulfil that role in a way that maintains public confidence in the institutions of government.
- Watchdog report prompts renewed calls for Indigenous people to run Indigenous procurement
- Nova Scotia tech experts say U.S. social media trial could have local ripple effect
- Ontario’s battered housing sector revises its projections down again
- Ontario moves to cancel SkyDome Act to free up downtown land. It’s not yet clear why
He concluded, however, that the applicants failed to demonstrate that Trudeau exceeded limits established by the written Constitution, unwritten constitutional principles or any other legal limits.
MacKinnon and Lavranos recently filed a notice of appeal with the Federal Court of Appeal.
Comments
Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.