A new process for how the Canadian Judicial Council will review misconduct allegations against judges has been written into the law.
A bill that received royal assent Thursday evening amends the Judges Act to clarify when a judge can be removed and changes the way the council reports recommendations to remove a judge to the federal justice minister.
Get daily National news
The law also creates a new panel to review complaints and determine whether a judge’s removal is justified, as well as a new process for how judges can appeal disciplinary decisions against them.
Justice Minister David Lametti says the new process will lead to timelier and more cost-effective resolutions, and replaces a more expensive, drawn-out process.
- Lethbridge city council’s cost-cutting for 2027 would impact waste services, transit
- RCMP investigating Calgary city hall corruption allegations, court documents reveal
- Ticket sites accuse Ontario government of botching resale law rollout
- B.C. calls social media ban for kids ‘promising’ but says it doesn’t go far enough
Anyone can make a complaint against a judge, but it must be done in writing and sent to the judicial council.
The judicial oversight process garnered heightened attention earlier this year when the council announced it would review a complaint against former Supreme Court justice Russell Brown, a probe that ended when Brown announced his retirement from the top court earlier this month.
Comments
Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.