Advertisement

Saskatchewan premier’s brother among those pardoned for traffic offence

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe announced the new provincial cabinet on May 31, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS / Liam Richards

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe has signed off on dozens of pardons for people with traffic offences, including his own brother.

On May 19, an order-in-council was signed by the premier granting clemency to about 30 people who were convicted of 37 offences under the province’s Traffic Safety Act.

The order shows Kris Moe, the brother to the premier, was one of the individuals pardoned after driving through an amber light on Jan. 23, 2021 in Prince Albert.

Kris Moe hung up when called for comment.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

The premier was not available for an interview.

A spokesperson for his office says the premier was not part of the discussions of who gets pardoned.

Story continues below advertisement

“Premier Moe recused himself from the consideration of this order-in-council at cabinet,” Julie Leggott, press secretary to the premier, said in a statement.

“Pardons are brought forward on an annual basis on the advice and recommendations of justice officials for lieutenant-governor approval, which has been a long-standing practice in the province.”

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said pardons for traffic offences are based on the recommendation of a police service or an RCMP detachment.

Noel Busse said there are four reasons for police to recommend pardons.

The first is the result of misidentification.

“In each case, the actual offender identified himself or herself to the peace officer as someone else at the time the ticket was issued. Subsequent police investigation revealed that an improper charge and conviction was entered against the wrong individual,” Busse said in a statement.

Other reasons include a police agency or prosecutor inadvertently overlooking withdrawal of a ticket, new information arising after ticket convictions or an administrative error.

 

Sponsored content

AdChoices