Advertisement

Surrey bylaw changes restricting political signage challenged in B.C. court

Click to play video: 'Surrey residents challenge city political sign bylaw in court'
Surrey residents challenge city political sign bylaw in court
A group of Surrey residents are taking the city to court. Members of Keep the RCMP in Surrey are challenging a city bylaw that restricts the ability to display political signs on private property. Grace Ke reports – Apr 26, 2022

A group of residents in Surrey, B.C. are challenging recent bylaw amendments that restrict their ability to post political signs on their private property.

Their petition, heard in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver on Tuesday, alleges the changes passed by Surrey councillors last October violate their charter-protected right to freedom of expression.

The controversial amendments expanded the municipality’s definition of political signage to include citizens’ initiatives and set a strict timeframe for when such signs can be posted.

“The effect of those amendments, my clients say, was to mean there are particular issues that aren’t the subject of a specific election, which can never be the subject of political signs,” said Kevin Smith, a partner at Farris LLP and the group’s lawyer. “Those signs are banned entirely.”

Story continues below advertisement

On Oct. 18, Surrey Council approved the bylaw amendments by a narrow margin of five votes to four. All councillors outside of Mayor Doug McCallum’s Safe Surrey Coalition voted against it.

With the changes, residents can post political signage after a federal or provincial election period, or the nomination period for local government and school district elections or byelections has begun. Citizens may also post signs from the time plebiscites or referenda are established.

Signs regarding recall or initiative petitions can be posted when the petition application is approved by the BC Elections officer. All signs must be removed within two weeks of a vote.

Click to play video: 'B.C. ombudsperson criticizes Surrey council decisions'
B.C. ombudsperson criticizes Surrey council decisions

Matthew Voell, the lawyer representing the City of Surrey, declined to comment on this story while the matter is before the courts. In court, he said Surrey is not banning political signs and suggested there is a disagreement in the interpretation of the amendments.

Story continues below advertisement

Ivan Scott, one of six members of the ‘Keep the RCMP in Surrey’ group who filed the petition, said they “drew a line in the sand” in court on Tuesday.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

“It’s important because there’s somebody down there in Surrey who has taken democracy to another low level and we want to bring it back up,” he told reporters outside the courthouse.

“I think we’ve got a really good case here, we’ve got support from everywhere here in Surrey.”

For many months, members of Keep the RCMP in Surrey posted signs opposing the city’s transition from the Mounties to a new municipal police force on their lawns.

Seven members of the group, including Scott, were banned in September 2021 from attending city council meetings — a move to “protect the democratic process,” McCallum said at the time. The council then sought a court injunction to keep them from showing up.

Six of the seven banned residents responded with a petition seeking to overturn the resolution banning them. They also filed a separate petition seeking to overturn October’s bylaw amendments on political signage.

Surrey’s council has discontinued its court petition for an injunction and withdrawn its resolution banning the residents. Hearings for the political signage case will continue on April 27.

Story continues below advertisement

— With files from Global News’ Toby Kerr, Janet Brown and Jon Azpiri

 

Sponsored content

AdChoices