The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld the constitutionality of a key legislative change to the jury-selection process.
In a ruling from the bench today, the high court said scrapping so-called “peremptory challenges” amounted to a purely procedural change, one that applies retrospectively.
Peremptory challenges are a mechanism that allowed lawyers for either side to dismiss a certain number of prospective jurors without an explanation.
Get daily National news
In January, Ontario’s Court of Appeal unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of the decision to drop them.
- ‘We have to move quickly’: Canadians lend a hand as massive relief effort in Nepal begins
- Staffer injured in Columbia Icefield all-terrain vehicle rollover
- 20.2% property tax increase required if Calgary funds all 2027 budget requests
- Ontario student accused in U.S. of taking airport photos for Chinese official
However, the appeal court also found that anyone who chose to be tried by a jury before the new rules took effect in September 2019 was entitled to proceed with peremptory challenges, even if the trial begins after that date.
As a result, many jury trials that unfolded in the time between the implementation of the new rules and the appeal court’s ruling could have potentially been overturned.
Comments
Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.