Judicial review sought after Crown land removed from list of pending protected areas

The coastal barrens and wetlands known as Owls Head is shown in a handout photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO-Nova Scotia Nature Trust

HALIFAX – The lawyer for a retired biologist and an environmental group is seeking judicial review of Nova Scotia’s decision to remove a section of Crown land along the province’s Eastern Shore from a list of pending protected areas.

Jamie Simpson said Tuesday his clients will make an initial appearance in Nova Scotia Supreme Court Sept. 23.

Earlier this month, the court granted Bob Bancroft and the Eastern Shore Forest Watch Association more time to proceed with their legal action.

Justice Kevin Coady ruled the group could still seek judicial review even though their filing came more than six months after the government in 2019 quietly removed the Owls Head coastal headlands from a list of land awaiting legal protection.

Story continues below advertisement

United States-based developers Beckwith and Kitty Gilbert have proposed to build as many as three golf courses in the area.

The 285 hectares of land contains rare coastal ecosystems and a habitat for species at risk such as the piping plover.

Click to play video: 'Community rallying to stop sale of Owl’s Head park'
Community rallying to stop sale of Owl’s Head park

In his Aug. 5 decision, Justice Kevin Coady said despite the late filing, there was no way for the applicants to know about the government’s decision before it was revealed in a CBC media report based on an access to information request.

“The secrecy of the decision precluded any member of the public from legally responding within the six-month window,” Coady wrote. “There is nothing in the evidence to suggest the applicants were dragging their feet.”

Simpson says his clients hope to get the court to agree that the process used by the Department of Lands and Forests was inappropriate.

Story continues below advertisement

“Maybe that was a good decision to make, maybe not, but we think the public should have been given the opportunity to know this was happening and to provide comment,” he said.

Simpson says the case is important because roughly 100 other properties known as provincial parks are awaiting official protection and are “essentially open to government sale to developers.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 18, 2020.

Sponsored content