Regional Métis leaders raise concerns about national council, call for reform

The regional Metis presidents of Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan are calling for reform of the Metis National Council, raising serious concerns about "dysfunction" and about a lack of transparency involving financial and administrative matters within the national body. David Chartrand, president of the Manitoba Metis Federation, middle, carries the Metis flag as he and fellow Metis Federation leaders and delagates march to the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa, Thursday, April 14, 2016. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick. Sean Kilpatrick / The Canadian Press

The regional Métis presidents of Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan are calling for reform of the Métis National Council, raising serious concerns about “dysfunction” and about a lack of transparency on the national body’s finances and administration.

Métis National Council vice-president David Chartrand rejects the allegations, saying the “real issue” involves concerns about the way the Ontario Métis government defines people as Métis, and the national body has told the Ontario body its membership in the governance institutions of the Métis Nation is suspended.

“This is about the very essence of protecting our nation,” Chartrand said.

Last week, the presidents of the Métis Nation of Ontario, the Métis Nation-Saskatchewan and the Métis Nation of Alberta — three of the national body’s five components, along with a similar group in British Columbia and one Manitoba, which Chartrand leads — met for two days to discuss ways to co-operate and to negotiate more directly with the federal government, circumventing the national council.

Story continues below advertisement

Last June, these same three regions each signed self-governing agreements with Ottawa. That’s the first time the federal government has signed such arrangements with Métis groups following recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions formally recognizing Métis rights and that they’re part of federal financial responsibilities.

The Métis Nation of Ontario’s president Margaret Froh said the meeting was positive, aimed at building on those agreements by working together and sharing ideas to help their communities.

“There was incredible goodwill, it was a respectful environment. We had an opportunity to talk about things like our registries, to talk about all the work that’s gone into our history, our governance, how it is that we manage our registry, the programs and services that we’re offering,” Froh said.

But the three leaders also discussed concerns they share about governance at the Métis National Council (MNC).

They issued a declaration that the MNC “has become increasingly dysfunctional and unaccountable to its governing members and the Métis citizens.”

They point to the fact the national council has not held a board of governors meeting in over 14 months, despite repeated requests for one.

Despite this, MNC president Clement Chartier sent a letter to Froh earlier this week advising her the Métis Nation of Ontario is suspended and no longer eligible to participate in the governance of the national council.

Story continues below advertisement

Alberta president Audrey Poitras said the MNC doesn’t have the authority to do this. A suspension can only be imposed by members at a general assembly meeting, she said, and she “absolutely” doesn’t accept that Ontario has been suspended.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

The concerns about Ontario involve its citizenship registry. In August 2017, the provincial government and the Métis Nation of Ontario held a joint announcement outlining work by historians that had identified six new Métis communities in the province.

This sparked concerns in the national leadership that Ontario is allowing people who may not be Métis into its registry, and in doing so, is violating an agreement struck in 2002 among all the regional governments on an official citizenship definition.

The question of Métis identity is delicate, and fundamental. The Métis are descended from European fur traders and First Nations people, who intermingled beginning in the 18th century. But it’s only in the 1980s that the Canadian government recognized the Métis as an Indigenous People with rights under Canadian law. And only in 2003 did the Supreme Court of Canada rule that the Métis are a nation distinct from other Indigenous people with rights protected by the Constitution.

Story continues below advertisement

Chartrand does not believe the new communities are legitimate.

“They are not part of us, never were. There is no connection historically in any way or fashion that they can use as even an argument to say that they are part of our nation,” Chartrand said.

He believes allowing these new communities to become part of the Métis Nation could undermine its integrity by flooding the Métis nations with “hundreds of thousands, potentially millions, of people into our nation that aren’t us,” Chartrand said.

“It’s something we must clearly be fearful of as a people, because we cannot allow anybody to try to water down and create a special interest group of a nation, instead of a citizen of a nation.”

Click to play video: 'Lawsuit claims land in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan owed to Métis'
Lawsuit claims land in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan owed to Métis

In November 2018 Chartrand brought these concerns to a general assembly and a resolution was passed that placed Ontario on probation. It called for an external committee to review Ontario’s membership registry.

Story continues below advertisement

But Ontario has refused to allow it. Froh said the registry belongs to her government and contains a large amount of sensitive, personal information.

The Ontario nation hired a historical expert to conduct its own review of the files, which Froh believes should help satisfy the concerns raised by Chartrand and others. She also called Chartrand’s concerns about thousands or millions of new citizens being added by Ontario “absurd,” noting her province’s registry has only about 20,000 members.

“What we have said is, we have and will complete this independent review … and we’ll be in a position to be able to talk about it, but we’re not prepared to simply open up our registry and all of that personal information to outsiders,” she said.

Poitras, the Alberta leader, said she doesn’t have a problem with Ontario’s registry and doesn’t understand Chartrand’s concerns. She continues to call for a board meeting to discuss them.

“What we want is transparency and accountability, and if somebody is doing something wrong, let’s talk about what that wrong is and let’s fix it.”

The “tri-council” also raised questions about the finances and governance of the MNC in its resolution last week, including calls for more transparency about financial audits, and limits on amounts spent on consultants.

Story continues below advertisement

The three leaders called for a working group to discuss reforming the MNC “or the creation of a new national structure to better represent the interests of Métis governments.”

Their resolution also says they will continue to work through the MNC on funding negotiations until after the 2020 federal budget is released, as those talks are already underway. But they’re asking to negotiate directly with Ottawa in the future on program and service funding and to ensure money goes to Métis citizens and governments “without allocations to the MNC.”

Chartrand brushed aside the tri-council’s concerns, calling them “smoke and mirrors” designed to distract from a “backroom deal” brokered among the leaders.

Froh said she hopes the politics involved in these issues doesn’t overshadow the progress that has been achieved when it comes to Métis governments finally getting recognition by the federal government.

“I don’t want people to lose track of the amazing thing that happened last week in that we, as Métis governments, came together, recognizing each other. That is what being self-determining is about, that’s what leadership is about: coming together to work together to move the yardstick forward to advance true reconciliation.”

Sponsored content