Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

After latest Oppenheimer Park shooting, critics ask: will it take a death to spark change?

Frustration is growing as the public seeks a solution to ongoing problems associated with the Downtown Eastside encampment. It follows another shooting that's sent one person to hospital. Nadia Stewart reports – Dec 13, 2019

Will someone have to die before the City of Vancouver acts to address an entrenched homeless camp in Oppenheimer Park?

Story continues below advertisement

That’s the question critics are asking a day after the third shooting at the park in the last six months. Vancouver police said Thursday night’s shooting left a man in hospital with serious injuries.

Park commissioner John Coupar renewed his call for an injunction to clear the park Friday.

“It’s just gone on too long,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

“The Green-COPE coalition at park board has been reluctant to move. They want to find housing for everybody.

“The problem is we’re not the board of housing, we’re the park board.”

The Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation voted earlier this week to give its general manager the power to seek a court injunction to remove the campers — but only after a series of stringent conditions were met, including bringing in a third-party consultant.

“With the shooting and with another shooting recently related to Oppenheimer Park I’m concerned that it’s only a matter of time before we unfortunately do see a death,” said Vancouver Coun. Melissa De Genova.

“I don’t want to fear monger … but do I lose sleep over this? In fact I do.”

Story continues below advertisement

Police have repeatedly warned about a growing criminal element preying on the park’s homeless residents, and firefighters have raised alarms about dangerous warming devices being used in the camp’s tents. There were two fires at the camp in recent weeks.

De Genova served on the Vancouver park board in 2014, the last time a homeless camp sprung up in Oppenheimer Park. One person died in that camp.

The daily email you need for 's top news stories.

De Genova said despite the fractious political relationship between her Non-Partisan Association (NPA) and the then-governing Vision Vancouver majority, the parties agreed an injunction was necessary.

Story continues below advertisement

She said firmer action is necessary given that even when offered housing this summer, some of the current campers elected to stay.

“BC Housing, within a week in late August, was able to find everyone who wanted housing, housing. But there were some people who still refused to leave the encampment.”

Oppenheimer Park is in the jurisdiction of the Vancouver park board, and the city’s mayor deferred questions Friday to that body.

The park board cancelled a scheduled press conference Friday morning and board chair Stuart MacKinnon declined an interview request.

Supporters of the camp argue the city — and the camp’s detractors — aren’t serious about the safety of the city’s homeless.

Story continues below advertisement

Advocates for the homeless gathered at Oppenheimer Park Friday to “celebrate one-year of resilience” in the face of housing and drug crises.

“We only displace people from camps when we are looking for excuses to get rid of the visible manifestations of homelessness and poverty that are the results of government action,” said Anna Cooper with the Pivot Legal Society.

“If the city was really concerned with people’s safety we would be talking about not just the housing crisis but the opioid crisis,” said camp spokesperson Chrissy Brett.

Story continues below advertisement

“When the city talks about how they came up with an amazing plan to house 100 people, there were people literally dying in the streets, including my niece who was completely forgotten … during their unorganized plan to decamp back in August.

“Their plan didn’t create any new modular housing or new placements.”

Fiona York with the Carnegie Community Action Project touted the community and self-governance structure she said had evolved in the camp in year-plus since it sprung up.

Story continues below advertisement

“We have a community council, we have peers who sport our 24/7 overdose prevention site,” she said.

“People come here for that sense of safety and belonging.”

Downtown Vancouver Business Association president and CEO Charles Gauthier says in addition to drawing a disproportionate amount of city and policing resources, leaving the camp as it is remains inhumane.

“It sort of reminds me of how we wait until we get to a critical juncture [to act]”, said Gauthier.
Story continues below advertisement

“The 2011 Occupy Vancouver event that was on the front plaza of the Vancouver Art Gallery, at the time, it took the death of a young woman due to a suspected overdose to get the city to move in and get the injunction.”

Gauthier has advocated looking at San Diego’s model to address the homelessness issue. That city has built temporary shelter structures with hostel-like accommodations and bathrooms, which are staffed by outreach workers.

He said the City of Vancouver has expressed little interest in the idea, but the company behind the hard-shelled tent structures has reached out to him for a meeting next week.

Story continues below advertisement

He said if homelessness truly is a “crisis,” we should treat it as such, adding that temporary housing of the type he advocates would spring up in no time if there were a major earthquake.

“Letting people live in tents in a park with those dangerous situations that are occurring, either for their own safety or public safety, why [is] that acceptable, and why aren’t we looking at things like these types of shelters?” he said.

The next steps around the park remain unclear. The park board has provided no timeline for the hiring of its third-party consultant, and will not reconvene until 2020.

The board has also not made clear how it will accomplish the other conditions required to get an injunction: finding a way to get campers to leave voluntarily and only when there is enough housing or shelter space, and doing so in accordance with the principles of reconciliation.

Story continues below advertisement

-With files from Nadia Stewart

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article