Advertisement

Multiple complaints over controversial anti-abortion billboard in West Kelowna

Click to play video: 'Controversial anti-abortion billboard draws complaints'
Controversial anti-abortion billboard draws complaints
Several people have complained about a controversial anti-abortion billboard in the West Kelowna area. Jules Knox reports – Apr 1, 2019

An anti-abortion billboard in the West Kelowna area has recently drawn several complaints.

The board, which is on the highway near Grizzly Road, features a pregnant woman on the left and a mother and baby on the right. It reads: “Our right to life does not depend on our location.”

Several people have recently complained to Ad Standards Canada about the billboard’s content, according to Marlon Bartram, executive director of Kelowna Right to Life Society.

Pro-choice advocate Jo Scofield called the message misleading.

“It’s frustrating because it’s a blatant scare tactic. There is no such thing as full-term abortions; you don’t need a law to make something illegal or criminalize something that is not going to happen anyway,” she added.

Story continues below advertisement

“We wouldn’t let any other advertising group put up a sign that is blatantly false, uses misinformation and has no bearing on reality,” Scofield said.

But Bartram argued for free speech.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

“The ad makes no claim about the frequency of late-term abortion in Canada. It simply states our right to life does not depend on where we are, our location,” he said.

The billboard has been up for more than a year, but Bartram said that after word of the initial complaint to Ad Standards got out recently, there were nine more.

“It’s not a fair use of ad standards,” he said. “It’s essentially the pro-abortion movement using ad standards as a tool to silence the pro-life movement.”

Scofield said if the group wants to reduce abortion rates, funds would be better spent on improving access to contraception or better education and sexual health initiatives.

“But they’re welcome to advertise in a way that logically and scientifically sound and isn’t intended to cause mental distress or be emotionally abusive to people,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Bartram said he’s expecting a decision from the Ad Standards council in mid-April.

Sponsored content

AdChoices