In written arguments filed with Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal this week, Ottawa says a failure by one province to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will hurt the rest of the country.
“Failure by one province to reduce GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions will harm other provinces and territories, harm Canada’s relations with other countries, and impede international efforts to mitigate climate change,” the factum says.
Saskatchewan has asked the court to rule whether the federal government’s plan to force a carbon tax on the province is constitutional.
The province believes its own climate change plan, which doesn’t include a carbon tax, is enough to reduce emissions.
Spokesman Jim Billington said Saskatchewan’s constitutional lawyers are still analyzing the factum.
“However, we maintain that the carbon tax is unconstitutional because the federal government is applying a tax unevenly across the country based on their evaluation of provincial climate change plans, which they have no constitutional right to do,” he said Wednesday in a statement.
Ottawa argues in the factum that there is no constitutional requirement for federal laws to operate equally throughout Canada.
![Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.](https://globalnews.ca/wp-content/themes/shaw-globalnews/images/skyline/national.jpg)
Get daily National news
WATCH BELOW: Sask. premier calls carbon tax a ‘vote-buying scheme’
![Click to play video: 'Sask. premier calls carbon tax a ‘vote-buying scheme’'](https://i2.wp.com/media.globalnews.ca/videostatic/550/282/carbon%20tax%201.jpg?w=1040&quality=70&strip=all)
The factum says emissions in Saskatchewan have increased by 10.9 per cent since 2005 and accounted for 10.8 per cent of the country’s emissions in 2016.
The case won’t be heard in court until at least next spring.
Ontario has joined Saskatchewan’s case as an intervener while also filing its own legal challenge.
Ottawa argues in the factum that the law isn’t an intrusion into provincial jurisdiction. It says the act implements the “polluter pays” principle which is “firmly entrenched in environment law in Canada.”
“A provincial failure to act could undermine an agreement that is important to the country’s prosperity as a whole,'” the factum says.
The case won’t be heard in court until at least next spring.
The federal government had asked all provinces to put a minimum price on carbon emissions of $20 a tonne by Jan. 1.
Last week, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau detailed a plan to charge a carbon tax in Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and New Brunswick _ the four provinces refusing to comply.
WATCH: Trudeau says critics of carbon tax want to ‘make pollution free again’
![Click to play video: 'Trudeau says critics of carbon tax want to ‘make pollution free again’'](https://i1.wp.com/media.globalnews.ca/videostatic/859/63/2018-10-29T16-00-13.533Z--1280x720.jpg?w=1040&quality=70&strip=all)
Ottawa plans to rebate the carbon tax money to residents in those provinces. It’s estimated the average household payment in Saskatchewan will be $598.
On Tuesday, Saskatchewan introduced its own climate change law, which would amend current legislation.
Under the proposal, large emitters would be required to register with the province and could receive credits for reaching targets.
Comments