April 30, 2018 10:27 pm
Updated: May 2, 2018 5:33 am

Barton Street jail was a ‘hostile’ environment at time of inmate death, coroner’s inquest hears

Orange pill found in Stephen Neeson's cell at the Barton Street jail.

Ontario Coroner's Inquest
A A

On Feb. 15, 2015, there was “a great deal of hostility,” at the Barton Street jail according to former correctional officer Chris Pedlar and it was directed at him.

READ MORE: Cononer’s inquest hears inmate asked to be put on methadone for addiction two months before his death

He testified before a coroner’s inquest into eight inmate deaths, on Monday, as part of the evidence related to the case of Stephen Neeson.

Story continues below

Around the time of his death, Pedlar explained the jail was in lockdown. Inmates had been restricted to their cells for more than four days straight. This caused boredom, Pedlar testified, and high anxiety on unit 5C, where Neeson’s cell was located.

Pedlar told the inquest at the time he was thinking to himself, “I just want to get these guys unlocked before they riot on me.”

The lockdown had been issued because a pair of nail clippers were missing, he said. Correctional staff were in protective gear searching the institution. Inmates on unit 5C, he notes, became aware that other units in the jail were no longer in lockdown and became increasingly agitated.

“It was not a normal day,” he explained. By the morning of Feb. 15, he told the jury that he had to open the meal hatch on each cell door in the hopes of letting fresh air into what had become a stagnant environment. Inmates were working out to pass the time, he said, and many of the toilets had become plugged with feces.

According to an agreed statement of facts by 9:30 a.m., the lockdown was lifting. Inmates who worked as cleaners had been released to perform their duties but it wasn’t long before they were told to return to their cells.

“I heard one of the inmates say, ‘He’s not waking up, he’s not moving,'” Pedlar told the jury.”That’s a CO’s worst nightmare.”

Kari Antilla, a sergeant who responded to the “code white,” gave testimony, on Monday, that he found Neeson laying on his mattress, on his back with hands folded. He looked like a normal person sleeping, he said. But upon further inspection rigor mortis became apparent.

The agreed statement of facts regarding Neeson makes note of “fishing” activity happening between cells on Feb. 14, 2015. It also lists medication as being administered by a nurse several times at his cell that day.

The inquest heard from Pedlar that there was a “great deal” of drug hoarding happening at the jail.

During the lockdown Pedlar said he would accompany a nurse who would put medication through the meal hatch. From there, they would watch to see if medication being taken through a small window.

READ MORE: Barton Street jail to add 4 ‘addictions nurses’ to help manage opioid crisis, inquest told

Outside of the inquest, Wade Poziomka, representing the Prisoners HIV/AIDS Support Action Network (PASAN) expressed concern.

“It sort of came out [Monday] the medication was administered in a way that is inconsistent with the policy the ministry has in place,” he said. “I think when the policies aren’t followed, you’ll have things like this happening, hoarding of medication and ultimately, it might lead to what we’re seeing here — eight deaths in a four-year period at the Hamilton jail.”

As a point of clarification Poziomka, adds, his remarks are not in relation to any of the witnesses before this inquest or the deaths being examined but rather an acknowledgement that when policies aren’t followed, there is the potential for “dangerous consequences,” as a result.

A search of Neeson’s cell after his death led to the discovery of four pills that nursing staff identified as his medication, the inquest heard.

Toxicology shows a number of drugs in his system. Although individually, the reports determined they are not at “toxic” levels, together, Dr. John Fernandes testified, they could have depressive effects on the respiratory system.

“We’re here ultimately making an argument to have a jury come back with recommendations that will hopefully make some changes to policies when the policies themselves aren’t being followed,” said Poziomka. “So I wonder sometimes if we’re wasting our time or not.”

© 2018 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Report an error

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.