March 20, 2018 4:34 pm
Updated: March 20, 2018 4:35 pm

Canmore to enter second round of public consultation on Olympic bid

The town of Canmore will undertake a second phase of public consultations to develop a set of principles to guide its town council on a potential Olympics bid.

John Himpe / Global News
A A

While the City of Calgary has yet to begin what it describes as “robust public engagement” on the possibility of hosting the 2026 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games, the town of Canmore is set to begin a second round of gathering public input as it draws nearer to making a decision on whether it wants to be part of a prospective bid.

Story continues below

“We started a first phase of public engagement through the month of March, and that involved a survey and an open house to gauge citizens’ desires for potential benefits and legacies coming out of the games,” said Canmore chief administrative officer Lisa de Soto.

“[We also gauged] their concerns regarding the cost or other issues associated with delivery of the Games.”

READ MORE: Canmore to spend $200K on studying town’s role in potential Calgary Olympic bid

Some of the concerns expressed through the first round of public consultation focussed on issues like transportation and traffic congestion, affordability of housing, environmental impacts and the possibility that Canmore might have “no say” in what happens to it as the process goes on.

However, residents do see some potential opportunities, such as legacy projects like affordable housing, sports facilities and an enhanced transportation system.

“[The response has] been fairly balanced,” de Soto said. “Certainly we have residents that are on the full spectrum from adamantly opposed to ardent supporter.”

“I would say the bulk of residents are in the middle and they see some positive legacies that could come from the games if [there was] certainty in costs and crowd and transportation management.”

A series of 13 guiding principles for how council will conduct itself through the games process also came from the consultations. Among those principles is a mission to ensure the town is a recognized partner in the Olympic process, a commitment to transparency and a promise to minimize the town’s financial exposure.

“We’re taking those set of principles back out to the public for review and input through another survey and stakeholder meeting sessions,” de Soto said. “We’ll be presenting a final set of guiding principles for council’s consideration in May.”

READ MORE: Correct version of Olympics report released by Calgary city administration

A commitment to developing a plan for public consultation is one of six recommendations Calgary city council is being asked to approve as it debates a bid to host the Games this week.

It’s also being asked to approve a structure for an Olympic bid corporation (bidco) which would allocate 19 board of directors seats to the parties expected to be involved in a potential bid. This includes the city, the province, the federal government and the Canadian Olympic Committee each getting three seats, while Canmore and the Canadian Paralympic Committee would get one seat each.

“We haven’t had any discussions with the City of Calgary about the bidco structure,” de Soto said. “We do believe it’s important that a bid corporation get up and running. And certainly, a bid corporation — if we participated in one — that doesn’t necessarily mean there would be an approval to bid.

“We have asked to be a full member and participant in that bid structure. That bid structure has not been proposed to the town of Canmore.”

De Soto said one comment which has been voiced loud and clear by Canmore residents is that there hasn’t been enough information about the impacts to the town, the costs to the town, and what would be required of the community to support the delivery of the games.

“Those are still being determined, and that’s why it’s very important that the bid corporation get up and running so that those questions could be answered.”

© 2018 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Report an error

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.