Advertisement

Large family refused rental home by landlord takes case to B.C. Human Rights Tribunal

Large family refused rental home by landlord takes case to B.C. Human Rights Tribunal - image
AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File

A mother in a family of six has put together a case where she claims their human rights were infringed after a landlord told her she couldn’t rent a property because she had too many children.

The B.C. Human Rights Tribunal will hear Robbin Abernathy’s case about how John Stevenson infringed her right to rent a three-bedroom, two-bathroom property for the family.

Abernathy’s children are between the ages of one and eight, and she said her kids are small enough for two to share a bedroom comfortably.

According to the Reasons for Decision Application to Dismiss a Complaint, Abernathy knew fitting into the home would be a “squish”, but tribunal member Devyn Cousineau noted, “there’s nothing in the material to suggest the house could not service Abernathy’s family.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Residential Tenancy Branch (RTB) has a guide that states, “A landlord usually cannot refuse to rent to people because they have children, but can limit the number of people living in a rental unit.”

The BC Human Rights Clinic said the RTB needs to look at this decision.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

“The guides and policies and other documents that it’s putting out to the public to make sure that they accurately reflect the human rights obligations that landlords have,” said clinic lawyer Laura Track.

Abernathy has found another place to call home, but has to pay $500 more in monthly rent compared to Stevenson’s property.

The RTB has not returned our request for comment.

It isn’t clear when the case will be heard by the tribunal.

Sponsored content

AdChoices