Afghan reaction mixed on Donald Trump’s tough-talking speech

President Trump’s plan for Afghanistan
WATCH: U.S. President Donald Trump has announced plans to send more troops into Afghanistan without a timeline for their withdrawal. Jackson Proskow reports on what that could mean for America's longest-running war.

KABUL – Afghans on Tuesday welcomed U.S. President Donald Trump’s harsh words for Pakistan in a speech outlining his strategy for the war-torn country that critics said offered little in the way of details and ruled out nation-building.

Trump said U.S. troops had a single-point agenda and that was to eliminate extremist fighters.

“We are not nation-building again,” he said Monday night. “We are killing terrorists.”

Highlights from Donald Trump’s speech on strategy in Afghanistan
Highlights from Donald Trump’s speech on strategy in Afghanistan

WATCH ABOVE: U.S. President Donald Trump opened the door to an increase in U.S. troop numbers in Afghanistan on Monday night as part of a new strategy for the region.

Trump accused Pakistan of giving extremists a safe haven, while next door in Afghanistan they kill U.S. troops. He said he wanted “immediate” results without saying what actions the United States might take against Pakistan if it ignored his warning.

Story continues below advertisement

But analysts in Pakistan warned that isolating Islamabad as the only culprit could increase the influence of regional players like Russia, China and even Iran.

READ MORE: Donald Trump opens door to more U.S. troops in Afghanistan

Imtiaz Gul, executive director of the Islamabad-based Center for Research and Security Studies, said of Trump’s accusations: “This has been the same narrative for the last 15 years. He just upped the ante by being more belligerent or hostile.” Gul warned that the president’s words could drive a wedge deeper into a region that needs co-operation if it is to find a peaceful end to Afghanistan’s protracted conflict.

The U.S. and Afghanistan have routinely accused Pakistan – and particularly its powerful intelligence agency the ISI – of harbouring insurgents and of waging a selective war, attacking those insurgents it considers its enemy and allowing those it has been known to use as proxies, either against hostile neighbours India or Afghanistan, to flourish.

READ MORE: Friendly fire could be to blame for deaths of 2 U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan

Prior to Trump’s speech Monday, Pakistan’s military spokesman Maj. Gen. Asif Ghafoor refused to speculate on what the U.S. president might say, but said it was clear he anticipated criticism, saying: “There is no organized network of terrorists in Pakistan and actions have been taken without any discrimination against all terrorist organizations.”

Story continues below advertisement

VIDEO: Donald Trump calls terrorists ‘thugs, criminals and losers’

Donald Trump calls terrorists ‘thugs, criminals and losers’
Donald Trump calls terrorists ‘thugs, criminals and losers’

Meanwhile, many Afghans interviewed by The AP in the capital Kabul expressed fears of a worsening situation in the country, bemoaning runaway corruption, high unemployment and increasingly deadly attacks. Several said Trump made it clear that he wasn’t about solving those problems.

READ MORE: Taliban writes ‘open letter’ to Donald Trump, urges U.S. to leave Afghanistan

Aziz Rahman, who works at a bank in Kabul, said Trump’s speech will make little difference to Afghans. After 16 years and tens of thousands of U.S. and NATO troops in his homeland. Rahman said the situation has only deteriorated with thousands of people fleeing.

“Trump’s speech is good for Americans, not for the poor people of Afghanistan,” Rahman said.

Story continues below advertisement

Waheed Muzhda, a political analyst in Kabul, expressed fear that Trump’s emphasis on a military victory seemed guaranteed to prolong the war and increase casualties.

“In the future we will witness a worsening of the war, more killing and more problems for the Afghan nation,” said Muzhda. “Mr. Trump only emphasized winning the war militarily, but if a military solution to the war could have been possible, this should have been achieved with presence of 150,000 troops.”


Gannon reported from Islamabad. Associated Press writers Amir Shah in Kabul and Munir Ahmed in Islamabad contributed to this report