Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

The Great Barrier Reef’s coral is dying off, but UNESCO doesn’t think it’s ‘in danger’

An undated handout photo made available by the Arc Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies on 10 April 2017 shows the bleaching damage on the corals of the Great Barrier Reef, Queensland, Australia. EPA/GREG TORDA/ARC CENTRE CORAL REEF STUDIES

The United Nations cultural body UNESCO has voted to leave the Great Barrier Reef off its “in danger” list despite recent widespread destruction of the World Heritage Site.

Story continues below advertisement

The decision, which was taken at a UNESCO committee meeting in the Polish city of Krakow, allows Australia’s conservative government to dodge political embarrassment and potential damage to the country’s lucrative tourism industry.

Coverage of the Great Barrier Reef on Globalnews.ca:

“We’re taking every action possible to ensure this great wonder of the world stays viable and healthy for future generations to come,” Australia’s Energy Minister Josh Frydenberg told Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio.

Story continues below advertisement

Australia’s management of the Great Barrier Reef has come under sustained criticism amid the biggest ever coral die-off as a result of the strongest El Nino in 20 years, a weather event that scientists believe is exacerbated by climate change.

Eager to head off charges that it was failing the World Heritage Site, which was recently pegged at being worth $56 billon to Australia, the Coalition government of Malcolm Turnbull lobbied all 21 UNESCO members.

READ MORE: Australia’s not exactly racing against time to save the Great Barrier Reef: UNESCO

Australia’s commitment to tackling climate change has been questioned by the government’s lingering love affair with fossil fuels. Coal is the country’s second-biggest export earner and the government is supporting a new $4 billion mine planned by Adani Enterprises which would ship millions of tonnes of coal through the waterways of the Great Barrier Reef.

Adani’s Abbot Point terminal, located adjacent to the reef, would also need to be expanded to accommodate all the extra traffic. This, environmentalists claim, would release plumes of soil and debris over the reef, causing damage to its ecosystem.

Story continues below advertisement

“An endangerment listing, as tragic as that would be, would be a more realistic representation of the state of reef and would at least force the federal government to act on climate change,” said Alix Foster Vander Elst, Greenpeace Australia Pacific campaigner.

Despite endorsing Australia’s management plan, the World Heritage Committee did express “serious concern” about the health of the reef.

It urged Australia to accelerate its efforts to improve water quality, describing it as “essential to the overall resilience of the property”.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article