Advertisement

U.S. missiles blast Syrian air base over chemical weapons attack

Click to play video 'U.S. attacks Syrian government airbase' U.S. attacks Syrian government airbase
WATCH: The U.S. is not ruling out further military action after striking a Syrian airbase with missiles to avenge the victims of Tuesday's horrific chemical attack. As Jackson Proskow reports, President Donald Trump's position remains unpredictable, worrying some American allies – Apr 7, 2017

UPDATE: Friday, April 7 – For the latest information, click here. 

The United States blasted a Syrian air base with a barrage of cruise missiles Thursday night in fiery retaliation for this week’s gruesome chemical weapons attack against civilians.

President Donald Trump cast the U.S. assault as vital to deter future use of poison gas and called on other nations to join in seeking “to end the slaughter and bloodshed in Syria.”

It was the first direct American assault on the Syrian government and Trump’s most dramatic military order since becoming president just over two months ago.

READ MORE: Donald Trump’s Syrian missile attack represents a dramatic turn of face

Announcing the assault from his Florida resort, Trump said there was no doubt Syrian President Bashar Assad was responsible for the chemical attack, which he said employed banned gases and killed dozens.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: Trump orders strike on Syrian military targets in response to chemical attack

Click to play video 'Trump orders strike on Syrian military targets in response to chemical attack' Trump orders strike on Syrian military targets in response to chemical attack
Trump orders strike on Syrian military targets in response to chemical attack – Apr 6, 2017

“Assad choked out the lives of innocent men, women and children,” Trump declared.

The attack almost completely destroyed the base near the city of Homs and killed four soldiers, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

The governor of Homs province said the U.S. attack serves the goals of Islamic State and armed terrorists.

The U.S. strikes – some 59 missiles launched from the USS Ross and USS Porter – hit the government-controlled Shayrat air base in central Syria, where U.S. officials say the Syrian military planes that dropped the chemicals had taken off. The U.S. missiles hit at 8:45 p.m. in Washington, 3:45 Friday morning in Syria. The missiles targeted the base’s airstrips, hangars, control tower and ammunition areas, officials said.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: U.S. launches missile strike against Syrian air base

Click to play video 'U.S. launches missile strike against Syrian air base' U.S. launches missile strike against Syrian air base
U.S. launches missile strike against Syrian air base – Apr 6, 2017

Trump approved the strikes without approval from Congress or the backing of the United Nations. The White House said about two dozen lawmakers from both parties were briefed on the actions.

Syrian state TV reported a U.S. missile attack on a number of military targets and called the attack an “aggression.”

READ MORE: Timeline of the Syrian civil war and the United States’ response

Iran foreign ministry spokesman Bahram Qasemi called the attack “destructive and dangerous” in a statement on Students News Agency ISNA.

“Iran … condemns use of chemical weapons … but at the same time believes it is dangerous, destruction and violation of international laws to use it as an excuse to take unilateral actions,” Qasemi said.

Story continues below advertisement

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia praised Trump’s “courageous decision” to attack Syria, calling it the correct response to “the crimes of this regime to its people in light of the failure of the international community to stop it.”

The surprise U.S. assault marked a striking reversal for Trump, who warned as a candidate against the U.S. getting pulled into the Syrian civil war, now in its seventh year. But the president earlier in the week appeared moved by the photos of children killed in the chemical attack, calling it a “disgrace to humanity” that crossed “a lot of lines.”

WATCH: Trump calls chemical attack in Syria ‘an affront to humanity’

Click to play video 'Trump calls chemical attack in Syria ‘an affront to humanity’' Trump calls chemical attack in Syria ‘an affront to humanity’
Trump calls chemical attack in Syria ‘an affront to humanity’ – Apr 5, 2017

U.S. officials placed some of the blame on Russia, one of Syria’s most important benefactors. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, in Florida with Trump, said Moscow had failed in living up to a 2013 agreement that was intended to strip Syria of its chemical weapons stockpiles.

Story continues below advertisement

“Either Russia has been complicit or Russia has been simply incompetent in its ability to deliver on its end of the agreement,” Tillerson said.

WATCH: Rex Tillerson says Russia should ‘consider carefully’ their relationship with Assad

Click to play video 'Rex Tillerson says Russia should ‘consider carefully’ their relationship with Assad' Rex Tillerson says Russia should ‘consider carefully’ their relationship with Assad
Rex Tillerson says Russia should ‘consider carefully’ their relationship with Assad – Apr 6, 2017

About 60 U.S. Tomahawk missiles, fired from warships in the Mediterranean Sea, targeted an air base in retaliation for the attack that America believes Syrian government aircraft launched with the nerve agent sarin mixed with chlorine gas.

The president did not announce the attacks in advance, though he and other national security officials ratcheted up their warnings to the Syrian government throughout the day Thursday.

READ MORE: Trump suggests Syrian president should step down following chemical attack

“I think what happened in Syria is one of the truly egregious crimes and shouldn’t have happened and it shouldn’t be allowed to happen,” Trump told reporters travelling on Air Force One to Florida, where he was holding a two-day summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: U.S. weighs military options after chemical attack in Syria

Click to play video 'U.S. weighs military options after chemical attack in Syria' U.S. weighs military options after chemical attack in Syria
U.S. weighs military options after chemical attack in Syria – Apr 6, 2017

The strike came as Trump was hosting Xi in meetings focused in part on another pressing U.S. security dilemma: North Korea’s nuclear program. Trump’s actions in Syria could signal to China that the new president isn’t afraid of unilateral military steps. even if key nations like China are standing in the way.

“This clearly indicates the president is willing to take decisive action when called for,” Tillerson said.

Trump has advocated greater counterterrorism co-operation with Russia, Assad’s most powerful military backer. Just last week, the Trump administration signalled the U.S. was no longer interested in trying to push Assad from power over his direction of a conflict that has killed hundreds of thousands of people and led to the worst refugee crisis since World War II.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Syria chemical weapon attack shows Bashar al-Assad free to act with impunity

U.S. officials portrayed the strikes as an appropriate, measured response and said they did not signal a broader shift in the Trump administration’s approach to the Syrian conflict.

Still, the assault risks plunging America into the middle of Syria’s conflict, complicating the safety of the hundreds of U.S. forces fighting a separate campaign against the Islamic State group in the north of the country. If Assad’s military persists in further gas attacks, the Trump administration might logically pursue increased retaliation.

READ MORE: From Afghanistan to Syria: U.S. military forays in the 21st century

Russia and Iran, Assad’s allies, pose other problems. Russian military personnel and aircraft are embedded with Syria’s, and Iranian troops and paramilitary forces are also on the ground helping Assad fight the array of opposition groups hoping to topple him.

Before the strikes, U.S. military officials said they informed their Russian counterparts of the impending attack. The goal was to avoid any accident involving Russian forces.

WATCH: Syrian man who lost over 20 members of his family in alleged gas attack sobs at their grave site

Click to play video 'Syrian man who lost over 20 members of his family in alleged gas attack sobs at their grave site' Syrian man who lost over 20 members of his family in alleged gas attack sobs at their grave site
Syrian man who lost over 20 members of his family in alleged gas attack sobs at their grave site – Apr 6, 2017

Nevertheless, Russia’s Deputy U.N. ambassador Vladimir Safronkov warned that any negative consequences from the strikes would be on the “shoulders of those who initiated such a doubtful and tragic enterprise.”

Story continues below advertisement

The U.S. also notified its partner countries in the region prior to launching the strikes.

Trump’s decision to attack Syria came three-and-a-half years after President Barack Obama threatened Assad with military action after an earlier chemical weapons attack killed hundreds outside of Damascus. Obama had declared the use of such weapons a “red line.” At the time, several American ships in the Mediterranean were poised to launch missiles, only for Obama to abruptly pull back after key U.S. ally Britain and the U.S. Congress balked at his plan.

WATCH: Idlib victims treated in Turkey speak out about suspected chemical attack

Click to play video 'Idlib victims treated in Turkey speak out about suspected chemical attack' Idlib victims treated in Turkey speak out about suspected chemical attack
Idlib victims treated in Turkey speak out about suspected chemical attack – Apr 5, 2017

He opted instead for a Russian-backed plan that was supposed to remove and eliminate Syria’s chemical weapons stockpiles.

Thursday night’s strikes were launched from the USS Ross and USS Porter and landed in the early morning Friday in Syria.

Story continues below advertisement

The world learned of the chemical attack earlier in the week in footage that showed people dying in the streets and bodies of children stacked in piles. The international outcry fueled an emotional response from Trump, who appeared to abandon his much-touted “America First” vision for a stance of humanitarian intervention, akin to that of previous American leaders. “I think what happened in Syria is a disgrace to humanity,” he said Thursday.

WATCH: Syrian doctor describes horror he witnessed in chemical attack victims

Click to play video 'Syrian doctor describes horror he witnessed in chemical attack victims' Syrian doctor describes horror he witnessed in chemical attack victims
Syrian doctor describes horror he witnessed in chemical attack victims – Apr 6, 2017

Trump seemed to rapidly reconsider his feelings about Assad, saying: “He’s there and I guess he’s running things, so something should happen.”

The show of force in Syria raises legal questions. It’s unclear what authority Trump is relying on to attack another government. When Obama intervened in Libya in 2011, he used a U.N. Security Council mandate and NATO‘s overall leadership of the mission to argue that he had legal authority – arguments that many Republicans opposed. Trump can’t rely on either justification here.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: If UN fails to respond to Syrian attacks, U.S. warns countries will be ‘compelled to act’

Unclear also is whether Trump is adopting any broader effort to combat Assad. Under Obama, the United States largely pulled back from its support for so-called “moderate” rebels when Russia’s military intervention in September 2015 led them to suffer a series of battlefield defeats. Instead, Obama sought to work with Russia on a negotiated transition.

Trump and his top aides had acknowledged in recent days the “reality” of Assad being in power, saying his ouster was no longer a priority. But the chemical weapons attack seemed to spur a rethink. In Florida on Thursday, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said of Assad: “There’s no role for him to govern the Syrian people.”

  • With files from Reuters