Advertisement

Penticton city council approves revised Skaha Park development

Click to play video: 'Revised Skaha Lake Park deals approved'
Revised Skaha Lake Park deals approved
Revised Skaha Lake Park deals approved – Dec 2, 2016

It’s been a contentious issue from the get-go, with some in favour and others adamantly opposed to a major development project in Skaha Lake Park.

READ MORE: Proposed water slides making a splash

But Thursday night the debate came to a close, with Penticton city council voting to move forward with the development.

The City of Penticton entered into an agreement with developer Trio Marine Group in August 2015 to build a waterslide park and expand the marina on municipally owned space along Skaha Lake.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

READ MORE: Penticton waterpark plans quashed

The initial plan was met with a huge backlash from some residents, with many upset about development plans and others frustrated with the lack of public consultation.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Commercial development of Penticton park land challenged in court

READ MORE: Company behind Skaha Lake Park development responds to lawsuit

The city, Trio and legal counsel went back to the drawing board and amended the initial plan, opting to remove the waterslide park all together, along with other changes.

You can see a full list of those changes here.

That didn’t appease most of those opposed. Hundreds attended a public meeting on the proposed changes last week, still voicing their concerns.

READ MORE: More than 700 turn out for Penticton Skaha Park meeting

Thursday was decision day and at a special meeting council voted 5-2 in favour of the new development plan.

Most people in attendance were residents who had previously voiced their opposition to the project and were unhappy with the result.

Sponsored content

AdChoices