Advertisement

Environmentalists raise concerns over possible ongoing oil leak in Alberta

Click to play video: 'Excessive steaming a factor in CNRL’s Primrose leaks: Alberta regulator' Excessive steaming a factor in CNRL’s Primrose leaks: Alberta regulator
WATCH ABOVE: Excessive steaming is being blamed for four big oil leaks near Cold Lake, Alberta. Permanent restrictions have now been placed on CNRL to prevent further contamination, but it has environmental groups calling for a hold on the practice. Carolyn Kury de Castillo filed this report on March 21, 2016 – Mar 21, 2016

Environmentalists and First Nations are raising concerns about a heavy oilfield in northeastern Alberta that may still be seeping water and bitumen years after the flow was first discovered.

The field, owned by Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (TSX:CNQ), was the subject of a major investigation by the province’s energy regulator after a major “flow-to-surface event” in 2013.

Surface water collected near four fissures in the ground continues to show an oily sheen. The Alberta Energy Regulator says a fifth, which first leaked in 2009, stills oozes small amounts of fresh bitumen.

READ MORE: Months into CNRL spills, questions about why more wasn’t done after 2009 report

The regulator says the situation is well-managed and CNRL considers the leak over and cleanup complete.

Fraser Thompson of the environmental law firm Ecojustice said it’s disturbing the leakage may be ongoing.

Story continues below advertisement

“There’s reason to be concerned that after what’s been about 3 1/2 years, the bitumen is still coming to the surface and the AER hasn’t been able to tell us when it’s going to stop.”

In June 2013, the Alberta Energy Regulator reported a leak in CNRL’s Primrose field near Cold Lake, Alta. Eventually, it emerged that nearly a million litres of bitumen mixed with water had seeped from fissures in the ground.

In a report released in the spring, the regulator blamed CNRL’s extraction method, which depended on injecting waves of high-pressure steam underground to soften the bitumen and force it toward collection wells from where it was pumped. The company was using too much pressure, the report concluded.

READ MORE: Steaming may have caused endless Cold Lake oil spills, CNRL admits

The regulator required CNRL to use a different approach, with lower steam pressures, and granted permission for the company to resume production from the field.

Surface water from the four sites involved in the 2013 leak continues to show effects, confirmed Julie Woo of CNRL.

“Bitumen seepage is not present in the surface runoff water currently being collected at the sites. That said, the water may contain a residual sheen.”

Bitumen continues to seep from the 2009 site, said AER spokeswoman Carrie Rosa.

Story continues below advertisement

“That first flow-to-surface still experiences occasional seepages,” she said.

“When it’s cold and frozen, the flow will stop. It is very, very slow and very, very minimal.”

The regulator, which has its own field inspectors, doesn’t have information on how much has leaked. The water and the bitumen are collected and kept out of the ecosystem, Rosa said.

Woo said biweekly visual checks revealed no bitumen this year at the 2009 site.

“Based on these observations, we are confident that the seepage has ended. We continue to monitor and visually inspect the site.”

The company website states: “Canadian Natural has fully cleaned up the flow-to-surface sites.”

Crystal Lameman, treaty co-ordinator for the Beaver Lake Cree First Nation, said her band has had concerns about the site since 2008 and is in court trying to get access to it. The site is within the band’s traditional territory.

The band is worried about the cumulative effects of heavy industry impact on its land. Lameman said the band isn’t satisfied with CNRL’s response.

READ MORE: Alberta oil spill: Examining CNRL’s safety record

“Our ancestors are buried there,” she said, speaking as a band member.

Story continues below advertisement

“We have a right to question and we have a right to receive an honest, transparent answer. And that’s what we’re not receiving.”

Nancy Scanie, an elder from the Cold Lake First Nation, said energy development in the area has taken a heavy toll.

“We have no more animals. We have no more fish. We have no more berries, no more medicines. How much more damage do they want to do?”

Sponsored content