Advertisement

Closing arguments expected in Rolling Stone defamation trial

Nicole Eramo, center, leaves the federal courthouse, Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2016 in Charlottesville, Va.. Eramo, a University of Virginia administrator who sued Rolling Stone magazine over its portrayal of her in a now-discredited story about a gang rape said Wednesday that the magazine's apologies for its journalistic failures didn't go far enough. (Ryan M. Kelly/The Daily Progress via AP).
Nicole Eramo, center, leaves the federal courthouse, Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2016 in Charlottesville, Va.. Eramo, a University of Virginia administrator who sued Rolling Stone magazine over its portrayal of her in a now-discredited story about a gang rape said Wednesday that the magazine's apologies for its journalistic failures didn't go far enough. (Ryan M. Kelly/The Daily Progress via AP).

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. – Attorneys will make their closing arguments in the defamation trial against Rolling Stone magazine over its botched story about a gang rape at the University of Virginia.

Closing arguments are expected Tuesday before jurors begin deliberating.

University of Virginia administrator Nicole Eramo is seeking $7.5 million from the magazine over its portrayal of her in the 2014 story “A Rape on Campus” about the sexual assault of the woman identified only as “Jackie.”

READ MORE: ‘Rolling Stone’ magazine headed to court over discredited rape story

A police investigation found no evidence to back up Jackie’s claims.

Eramo must prove that Rolling Stone knew what it was writing about her was false or should have known it was false. Attorneys for Rolling Stone have argued that they had full faith in Jackie as a source and never doubted her credibility.

Advertisement

Sponsored content

AdChoices