Shell Canada is donating its controversial Arctic energy exploration permits to clear the way for creating Canada’s third national marine protected area.
The 30 legally-questionable permits are being given to the Nature Conservancy of Canada, which will in turn hand them to the federal government.
“(The region) is adjacent to where the government has already said it would like to establish a conservancy, so our hope is that it will contribute to a much larger marine conservation area in the North,” said Shell Canada president Michael Crothers.
READ MORE: World Oceans Day: 5 strange fish that live in the deep
The permits cover 8,600 square kilometres north of Baffin Island at the eastern gate of the Northwest Passage. They also encompass the waters of Lancaster Sound, a particularly rich area of Baffin Bay that is home to belugas, narwhals, seals, walrus and many other Arctic animals.
Inuit who depend on the area for hunting have sought to have the area declared a marine conservation area since the mid-1980s.
“This delicate ecosystem represents our natural wealth as a people,” said Natan Obed of Canada’s national Inuit group, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami.
“I am encouraged to see such momentum towards protecting these waters for future generations of Inuit.”
Obed added his people expect to be consulted as the sanctuary is created.
Fisheries Minister Dominic LeBlanc told a World Oceans Day summit in Ottawa on Wednesday that the government needs to find a faster way to create marine conservation areas and promised to “erase years of inaction.”
But the Lancaster Sound proposal remains stalled by a debate over its borders. The federal government has outlined a smaller area that doesn’t include the permits, while Inuit and environmental groups have been holding out for a much larger protected zone that does.
In April, the World Wildlife Fund filed documents in Federal Court that argued Shell’s permits don’t even exist. The lawsuit claims the permits, purchased in the mid-1970s, were never renewed and have lapsed – a position that has found support among legal scholars.
Crothers said that lawsuit is unrelated to the company’s decision.
READ MORE: Scientists say carbon emissions could harm marine life in Atlantic Canada
“We had initiated talks with the government and with (the Nature Conservancy of Canada) months ago. We don’t think that litigation is the way to go.”
David Miller, the president of the World Wildlife Fund, said the court challenge might have nudged both Shell and the government, but added, “Shell has absolutely done the right thing.”
“If the litigation helped move it along, that’s great, but that’s not the point for us,” said Miller.
Minutes from 2014 meetings between federal and Shell officials suggest the company was unwilling to part with the permits without compensation or without conducting at least some seismic tests.
Crothers suggested the company’s thinking has changed since then.
- Invasive strep: ‘Don’t wait’ to seek care, N.S. woman warns on long road to recovery
- Ontario First Nation declares state of emergency amid skyrocketing benzene levels
- T. Rex an intelligent tool-user and culture-builder? Not so fast, says new U of A research
- Do Canadians have an appetite for electric vehicles? Experts are divided
“People were talking more hypothetically, looking to get some return. But from my perspective, we saw an opportunity that was pretty special – to be part of a conservation effort.
“These are lands with really special ecological significance.”
Shell will receive no benefit for the donation, Crothers said.
John Lounds, president of the nature conservancy, said the donation beats waiting for the courts.
“I’m pleased we were able to work with Shell. They really understand the importance of Lancaster Sound.”
Greenpeace Canada issued a release framing the feel-good announcement as a “historic defeat” for Shell and for the oil industry’s Arctic ambitions more broadly.
“This is their attempt to score some brownie points and exit from the scene gracefully, rather than have the permits pried from their hands by force,” Arctic campaigner Alex Speers-Roesch said in a release.
The federal government is likely to resume consultations with Inuit groups on the larger boundaries now made possible, said Miller.
“I see no obstacles in being able to announce this marine sanctuary in the relatively near future.”
The announcement comes a week after a report from the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society found the three North American governments are falling far behind their promises to protect marine environments.
Canada, Mexico and the United States have all pledged to protect at least 10 per cent of their waters. The report said less than one per cent of oceans off the continent are in fully functioning protected areas with permanent legal status and a management plan.
Adding an expanded Lancaster Sound would double the amount of ocean Canada has protected.
With files from Bruce Cheadle in Ottawa
Comments