Advertisement

Surrey Six defence lawyers allege police misconduct, want mistrial

A worker loads a body into a van following a multiple homicide in Surrey, B.C. Sunday, Oct. 21, 2007, as six people were found dead in an apartment building. It was a shocking gangland crime that could rightfully be called a bloodbath: six men murdered, execution-style, two of them innocent bystanders who happened to be in the wrong place.Two of the men accused in what's come to be known as the "Surrey Six" slayings. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward.
A worker loads a body into a van following a multiple homicide in Surrey, B.C. Sunday, Oct. 21, 2007, as six people were found dead in an apartment building. It was a shocking gangland crime that could rightfully be called a bloodbath: six men murdered, execution-style, two of them innocent bystanders who happened to be in the wrong place.Two of the men accused in what's come to be known as the "Surrey Six" slayings. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward

VANCOUVER – Two gang members convicted of the execution-style murders of six men in a Surrey, B.C., apartment are asking the court to declare a mistrial over the alleged mishandling by police of a confidential informant.

Cody Haevischer and Matthew Johnston were convicted last week of conspiracy and six counts of first-degree murder, seven years after the discovery of the bodies face down with bullets in their backs and heads.

On Monday, their lawyers asked the judge in the case to put off registering the convictions so they can call evidence into allegations of police misconduct involving the informer identified only as E5.

Before the year-long trial began, Crown lawyers and an independent third party appointed to assist the court held a closed-door hearing discussing how police dealt with the informer.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

Neither the defence lawyers nor the accused ever heard the informer’s evidence, and that person never testified at the trial.

Story continues below advertisement

“To outward appearances and perhaps only to outward appearances, I simply don’t know  we make the suggestion that the police handling of the informer, E5, would appear to have been lacking at best, and perhaps worse,” Johnston’s lawyer, Brock Martland, told a B.C. Supreme Court judge.

As part of the allegations of police misconduct, the defence lawyers will also argue there were problems with the conditions under which the accused were jailed, in particular after their arrests in 2009.

Several other legal submissions must be heard before the defence lawyers will get an answer on the abuse-of-process application. Justice Catherine Wedge will not hold a formal sentencing hearing  where family members may give victim impact statements  until those matters are decided.

Killed on Oct. 19, 2007 were Corey Lal and his brother Michael, associates Eddie Narong and Ryan Bartolomeo, and two bystanders, fireplace repairman Ed Schellenberg and Lal’s neighbour Chris Mohan.

The sentence for Haevischer and Johnston carries a mandatory minimum of life in prison with no possibility of parole for 25 years. The defence has 30 days to file notice of appeal following the sentencing.

Another trial is slated for the alleged leader of the Red Scorpions gang, Jamie Bacon, who faces charges in relation to the deaths.

Sponsored content

AdChoices