Advertisement

Group of Canmore residents asks government for environmental assessment of developments

Mt. Rundle rises behind homes being constructed in Canmore, Alta., Monday, April 24, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

A group of Canmore residents is asking the Alberta government to follow its own legislation and refer two major developments in the mountain town for an environmental assessment.

Lawyers for Bow Valley Engage, a not-for-profit society, sent a letter to Alberta Environment and Protected Areas this week asking for the assessment under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act on the Three Sisters Village and Smith Creek projects.

“The project location in the Bow Valley is an environmentally significant area and unique within the province of Alberta,” said the letter.

“Ecologically, it is a largely intact region within Alberta’s settled areas and serves as a key, and last remaining, corridor for wildlife that move between Banff National Park and Kananaskis.”

Click to play video: 'Frustration persists over two contentious Canmore developments'
Frustration persists over two contentious Canmore developments

No one from Alberta Environment and Protected Areas immediately responded to a request for comment Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

Canmore town council had initially rejected the projects, which could almost double the town’s population, but the Land and Property Rights Tribunal of Alberta ruled in May 2022 that both developments could go ahead.

The town, west of Calgary and directly next to Banff National Park, then unsuccessfully challenged that decision in the Court of Appeal of Alberta and it has since moved forward on the developments.

“There’s been quite a bit of legal action,” Karsten Heuer, a local wildlife biologist and president of Bow Valley Engage, said in an interview. “Those really focused on the private property rights of the developer.”

He said, however, there’s frustration in the community that residents and the elected town council could oppose the developments and still have them “shoved down our throats despite this being an area that’s super important to wildlife and our premier national park right next door.”

Heuer said there are still concerns about the environmental and social effects of the developments.

“That really stems from the fact that the original approval that they say gives them the right to develop is 32 years old and the world has changed and it has changed in some pretty significant ways.”

For example, he said, grizzly bears are now a threatened species in the province and communities have been built in Canmore that have blocked other wildlife corridors through the town.

Story continues below advertisement

“Is it appropriate for us to potentially cut off the last wildlife corridor so somebody could sell second and luxury tourist homes?”

Heuer said there are also issues around affordable housing, biodiversity and the climate crisis, including a higher risk of wildfires.

“Who’s going to pay the cost of those firefighting efforts to try to save all of those second and luxury tourist homes? It’s going to be the Alberta taxpayer,” he said.

“So, there are just some critical questions that need asking right now.”

Sponsored content

AdChoices