Advertisement

New process for punishing judges accused of misconduct becomes federal law

Click to play video: '‘Not comfortable’: Calls for more transparency after SCOC justice’s departure'
‘Not comfortable’: Calls for more transparency after SCOC justice’s departure
WATCH: 'Not comfortable': Calls for more transparency after SCOC justice's departure – Jun 13, 2023

A new process for how the Canadian Judicial Council will review misconduct allegations against judges has been written into the law.

A bill that received royal assent Thursday evening amends the Judges Act to clarify when a judge can be removed and changes the way the council reports recommendations to remove a judge to the federal justice minister.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

The law also creates a new panel to review complaints and determine whether a judge’s removal is justified, as well as a new process for how judges can appeal disciplinary decisions against them.

Justice Minister David Lametti says the new process will lead to timelier and more cost-effective resolutions, and replaces a more expensive, drawn-out process.

Anyone can make a complaint against a judge, but it must be done in writing and sent to the judicial council.

Story continues below advertisement

The judicial oversight process garnered heightened attention earlier this year when the council announced it would review a complaint against former Supreme Court justice Russell Brown, a probe that ended when Brown announced his retirement from the top court earlier this month.

Sponsored content

AdChoices