Advertisement

Indigenous advocate asks AFN chiefs to ensure ‘no child is left behind’ in settlement

Click to play video: '‘It’s not time for any of us to exhale:’ Blackstock responds to $40B deal on Indigenous child welfare compensation'
‘It’s not time for any of us to exhale:’ Blackstock responds to $40B deal on Indigenous child welfare compensation
Cindy Blackstock, executive director of the Caring Society, responded Tuesday after the government announced it had reached a $40-billion agreement in principle to compensate First Nations children. “Public pressure, and litigation and all of us paying attention has made a world of difference,” she said, adding “it is not time to look away and it’s not time for any of us to exhale.” – Jan 4, 2022

A First Nations child welfare advocate on Wednesday implored chiefs to ensure “no child is left behind” in a landmark $40-billion settlement agreement with the federal government.

Cindy Blackstock delivered the message to an Assembly of First Nations gathering in Ottawa, after being invited to take the stage by Cindy Woodhouse, regional chief in Manitoba who helped negotiate the agreement, which had been thrown into question since being rejected by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

The AFN, representing more than 600 First Nations across the country, had asked the tribunal to approve the settlement deal, which would see the government spend $20 billion to compensate families and children for systemic discrimination in the Indigenous child welfare system.It would also spend another $20 billion on making long-term reforms.

Read more: Feds ask for judicial review of $40B Indigenous child welfare settlement

Read next: Deadly Turkey earthquake exposes dangers of major fault lines below

Story continues below advertisement

Blackstock, the executive director of the First Nations Caring Society who first lodged the complaint at the heart of the issue, raised concerns that the agreement wouldn’t provide $40,000 in compensation to all eligible claimants, which is the amount the tribunal ruled they should get.

“We can make sure that in our First Nations canoe of justice, no child has to see their money go away and no child is left behind in justice,” she said Wednesday.

“We are capable of that.”

Following the tribunal’s decision in October, the federal government filed for a judicial review of some parts of its decision.

Click to play video: 'Reaction pours in after BC overhauls child welfare laws to remove barriers for Indigenous people'
Reaction pours in after BC overhauls child welfare laws to remove barriers for Indigenous people

Endorsing the settlement agreement loomed as one of the biggest items on the assembly’s agenda, with chiefs being asked to vote on what the organization should do next.

Story continues below advertisement

The chiefs had been preparing to vote on conflicting resolutions, with one asking them to support the final settlement agreement, while another sought to see the organization not appeal the tribunal decision and renegotiate the deal.

But on Wednesday, further talks between both sides took place, assisted by former senator and judge Murray Sinclair, who helped the AFN, federal government and lawyers for two related class-action lawsuits reach the $40-billion agreement in the first place, which was formally announced in January.

Chiefs ultimately voted late Wednesday against re-entering negotiations but to instead support compensation for victims outlined in the agreement and “those already legally entitled to the $40,000 plus interest under the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal compensation orders.”

Click to play video: 'Lawsuit seeks compensation for First Nations child welfare, end to apprehensions'
Lawsuit seeks compensation for First Nations child welfare, end to apprehensions

It also included a provision that AFN leaders must regularly return to chiefs to provide it with progress updates and “seek direction” from chiefs on implementing the final agreement.

Story continues below advertisement

Many chiefs thanked Blackstock, who was greeted with applause after further agreement was met and said she was honoured to see people come together for children harmed by Ottawa’s discrimination.

“We have had too many apologies, we’ve had too many compensation deals, we’ve had too many kids hurt. And this has got to be it,” she said.

She added more discussion on the long-term reform part of the deal would be presented to chiefs on Thursday.

Earlier in the day, the assembly heard from sisters Melissa Walterson and Karen Osachoff, plaintiffs on the case, about the impact the foster care system had on their lives.

Osachoff said she had been in the child welfare system since she was born and didn’t have a chance to grow up with her sister.

“Had it not been for the ’60s Scoop and the child welfare (system), her and I would have grown up together.”

She said she understands why the tribunal characterizes those like her as “victims,” but told chiefs to instead think of them as survivors.

“I am not a victim and our claimants are not victims.”

Sponsored content