Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Kremlin spokesman Steven Seagal visits occupied Ukraine to spread propaganda

RELATED: Russian government broadcaster Radio Sputnik is thriving on U.S. airwaves – May 10, 2022

Actor Steven Seagal is pushing pro-Russia propaganda through the country’s state media, repeating Kremlin talking points in a video posted Tuesday.

Story continues below advertisement

Footage shared by Russian state media shows the 70-year-old actor standing in what appears to be the wreckage of a building identified as Ukraine’s Olenivka prison in Donetsk, reports Insider.

In late July, more than 50 Ukrainian prisoners of war were killed in the facility in disputed circumstances.

In the video, however, Seagal claims U.S.-supplied HIMARS rockets, fired by Ukrainian troops, were the cause of the blast.

“This is where HIMARS hit, 50 people were killed, another 70 were injured,” Seagal said in the video posted to the pro-Kremlin news site TVZVEZDA on Tuesday.

Story continues below advertisement

“It definitely looks like a rocket. If you look at the burning and other details, of course, it’s not a bomb. Not to mention the fact that Russia really has a lot of artifacts from HIMARS.”

In the video, the Under Siege star is identified as a special representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation for humanitarian relations between Russia and the U.S.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Since the prison’s destruction, Russia and Ukraine have been attempting to cast blame on each other for the attack.

In the video, an English-speaking Seagal claims Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy ordered the shelling to silence a “Nazi” being held at the prison.

“The interesting thing is that one of the killed Nazis is a Nazi who just started talking a lot about Zelenskyy,” Seagal added, “and that Zelenskyy is responsible for the orders about torture and other atrocities that violate not only the Geneva War Convention, but are also crimes against humanity.”

Story continues below advertisement

Zelenskyy has been adamant that the attack was a “Russian war crime” and has accused Moscow of shelling the prison to cover up the murder and torture of prisoners of war.

Seagal, who has Russian heritage, has become increasingly tied to Russia over the years. In 2016, he was awarded a Russian passport from President Vladimir Putin. And in 2021 the self-styled musician officially joined a political coalition backing Putin, in an effort to adopt Russia as his home.

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and FILE – American action movie actor Steven Seagal visit a newly-built sports complex of Sambo-70 prominent wrestling school in Moscow. ALEXEI NIKOLSKY/AFP/Getty Images

In 2017, Ukraine took the step of banning the Above the Law actor from their country, labelling him a threat to national security.

Story continues below advertisement

The country defended the ban at the time, saying it was warranted for people like Seagal who “committed socially dangerous actions… that contradict the interests of maintaining Ukraine’s security.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin shakes hands with US actor Steven Seagal at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, 25 November 2016. EPA/ALEXEI DRUZHININ

Seagal rose to fame in the late 1980s and early ’90s as the star of many action films. He bonded with Putin over their mutual love of martial arts and Putin has often praised Seagal in public.

Story continues below advertisement

He faced a slew of allegations of sexual misconduct in 2018, amid a broader #MeToo reckoning in Hollywood. The Los Angeles district attorney’s office ultimately dismissed two potential cases against him later that year, after determining that the statute of limitations had expired in both instances.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article