Advertisement

Peel police officers cleared in fatal shooting of 28-year-old man: Ontario’s police watchdog

Jamal Francique was shot on Jan. 7, 2020. Supplied

Ontario’s police watchdog cleared an officer of wrongdoing in the shooting death of a man west of Toronto on Wednesday, saying there were no reasonable grounds to lay charges in the incident that took place last year.

The Special Investigations Unit noted, however, that there were legitimate questions about the Peel Regional Police officer’s conduct on the evening that Jamal Francique was shot in the head in Mississauga, Ont.

Joseph Martino, the director of the Special Investigations Unit, said in a report that the officer told investigators he feared for his life when Francique drove at him during a botched arrest.

Read more: Father struggles, seeks answers, 1 year after son’s death in Peel police shooting

“Confronted by a vehicle that the subject officer had reason to believe was intentionally being driven in his direction, the officer’s decision to disable its operating mind by shooting in the direction of the driver was not devoid of logic,” Martino wrote.

Story continues below advertisement

There were, however, aspects of the officer’s conduct that raised questions, Martino said.

“One may question, for example, the wisdom of the (subject officer) placing himself in the vicinity of a vehicle whose driver was evidently attempting to flee from police,” Martino wrote.

“There are those who would also take issue with shooting at a moving vehicle when the prospect of stopping the vehicle in its tracks is low and the risk of contributing to a dangerous situation on the roadway is real. On the other hand, one must be mindful of the fluid and dynamic nature of the incident.”

Police were investigating Francique for allegedly dealing drugs and possessing a firearm, the SIU said.

Read more: Community members meet with Mississauga, Brampton mayors over police-involved shootings

Officers were unable to confirm if Francique had a gun or was dealing drugs, but decided to arrest him for allegedly breaching bail conditions, the SIU said.

On Jan. 7, 2020, several plainclothes officers and their unmarked cars gathered near Francique’s home in Mississauga, Ont., where they waited for him to get into his car.

Around 5:45 p.m., the SIU said, Francique got into an Acura TSX and began to drive, but one officer was late blocking him in the driveway.

Story continues below advertisement

A second unmarked police car came behind Francique and tried to hem him in, the SIU said, while other officers got out of the cars and rushed to the area, guns pointed at the young man.

Francique accelerated toward a grassy area, the SIU said, and struck one car while one officer jumped out of the way.

Click to play video: 'Community gathers with elected officials over police shootings in Peel Region' Community gathers with elected officials over police shootings in Peel Region
Community gathers with elected officials over police shootings in Peel Region – Sep 3, 2020

At that point another officer on foot fired his gun four times as Francique drove towards him, the SIU said.

The Acura came to a halt 30 metres away after it hit a home.

The SIU said officers did not approach the car for fears of a gun — which was later found in Francique’s satchel — and waited until tactical officers arrived more than two hours later at 8:05 p.m.

Story continues below advertisement

The tactical team then approached with a shield and smashed the rear windows.

Read more: Rally and BBQ held in Brampton in honour of D’Andre Campbell and Jamal Francique

“Mr. Francique was seated in the driver’s seat in obvious and acute medical distress,” the SIU wrote. “He had suffered a gunshot wound to the left side of the head.”

Francique was taken to St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto and died three days later.

Knia Singh, a lawyer representing Francique’s family, criticized the SIU.

“The SIU has failed to serve Ontario’s diverse community in a way that fosters confidence in the process,” Singh said.

“The public perception from affected communities, lawyers, and human rights organizations, is that the SIU is heavily biased in favour of police.”

— With files from John Chidley-Hill

Sponsored content