Quest for Trump’s tax returns based on ‘mountainous record’ of evidence: prosecutor

The Manhattan district attorney’s office told a federal appeals court Monday that its quest to gain access to President Donald Trump’s tax returns is supported by “a mountainous record” of public allegations of misconduct.

The president and Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. have been battling for more than a year over a subpoena sent to Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, seeking eight year’s worth of his tax documents.

Attorneys for Trump have argued that Vance, a Democrat, is just trying to smear the president with an overly broad investigation that has no legal basis.

In a filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, lawyers for Vance again declined to reveal exactly why Trump is under investigation, citing grand jury secrecy rules.

1:04 Trump calls tax returns investigation ‘political witch hunt’ after Supreme Court’s ruling

But they cited multiple news reports in which Trump or his companies have been accused of overstating the value of his assets when dealing with potential business partners and lenders while minimizing the value of those same assets for tax purposes.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up

By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

“Any investigation into the types of potential financial improprieties described above would of necessity require a review, not only of tax returns, but source documents, working papers, and communications of the sort identified in the Mazars Subpoena, to evaluate the accuracy and good faith of the positions taken in the filings, as well as the roles of various employees and other potential witnesses,” they wrote.

Trump has called Vance’s investigation “a fishing expedition” and “a continuation of the witch hunt _ the greatest witch hunt in history.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled against Trump once in the case, dismissing his argument that presidents are immune from state criminal inquiries as long as they are in office.

Trump’s legal team then tried a different approach, saying the subpoena seeking his returns was issued in bad faith.

That argument was also rejected by a federal judge last month. Trump appealed.

Even if the appeals court decides in Vance’s favour, it is unlikely that Trump’s returns will then become public before the election. Any material produced as a result of the subpoena will also be protected by grand jury secrecy rules.