Advertisement

Federal Court of Appeal has upheld Tax Court ruling challenged by CRA: Cameco

The Saskatoon-based uranium miner said it is very pleased that the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the Tax Court's ruling. File / Global News

Cameco Corp. says the Federal Court of Appeal has upheld a 2018 decision of the Tax Court of Canada that was in the company’s favour.

The 2018 decision, which centred around its use of a subsidiary in Switzerland to sell and trade its uranium, was appealed by the Canada Revenue Agency.

The agency contended it was a sham established to avoid Canadian taxes, while Cameco maintained it was for legal and sound business practices.

The Saskatoon-based uranium miner said it is very pleased that the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the Tax Court’s ruling.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

The ruling covers Cameco’s 2003, 2005 and 2006 tax years.

Story continues below advertisement

Canada Revenue Agency officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

“Four judges have now found that Cameco complied with both the letter and intent of the law,” Cameco president and CEO Tim Gitzel said Friday in a release.

“We followed the rules, yet this 12-year dispute has caused significant uncertainty for our company and our stakeholders at a time when we have been navigating through some of the most challenging global market and economic conditions we have ever faced.”

Cameco noted that a subsequent decision by the Tax Court in April 2019 resulted in the company being awarded $10.25 million in legal fees and up to $17.9 million in disbursements for costs incurred as a result of its dispute with the agency.

Sponsored content

AdChoices