Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

China denies holding secret nuclear weapon tests underground

Military vehicles carrying the DF-41 intercontinental nuclear missile roll past Tiananmen Square during a military parade marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China, in Beijing, China, on Oct. 1, 2019. EPA/WU HONG

Nukes? What nukes?

Story continues below advertisement

China says it shouldn’t have to bother denying a report from the U.S. State Department that suggests the Chinese government may have triggered secret nuclear blasts at an underground test site last year.

The report, which was released on Wednesday and first revealed by the Wall Street Journal, raises concerns that China might have violated the “zero yield” standard for nuclear blasts. The standard basically prohibits countries from creating any kind of explosive chain reaction like the one used in nuclear warheads.

The U.S. State Department says it’s “possible” that Beijing breached that standard at China’s Lop Nur nuclear test site throughout last year, based on monitoring evidence of work around the site.

“China’s possible preparation to operate its Lop Nur test site year-round, its use of explosive containment chambers, extensive excavation activities at Lop Nur and a lack of transparency on its nuclear testing activities … raise concerns regarding its adherence to the zero yield standard,” the report said.

Story continues below advertisement

The report does not actually provide evidence of a low-yield test.

Zhao Lijian, a spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, dismissed the accusation and insisted that Beijing remains committed to a moratorium on nuclear tests. He also accused the U.S. of making false claims at a time when Washington is already eager to blame China for the coronavirus pandemic.

“China has always adopted a responsible attitude, earnestly fulfilling the international obligations and promises it has assumed,” Zhao said at a briefing. “The U.S. accusation against China is made of thin air, which is totally unfounded and not worth refuting.”

Zhao also accused the U.S. of hypocrisy by pointing out Washington’s decision to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (IMF) Treaty and other international agreements meant to restrict nuclear weapons development.

Story continues below advertisement

Jeffrey Lewis, an expert in arms control at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, called the evidence “thin” in a response on Twitter.

“U.S., Russia and China all conduct subcritical tests. Subcritical tests are not prohibited the CTBT (Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty), which is not in force and which neither the U.S. nor China has ratified,” Lewis wrote. “From satellites and seismic stations, subcritical tests are indistinguishable from low yield nuclear tests.”

He added that the whole issue is really a “matter of belief” because it’s hard to prove that Russia or China are not “up to no good.”

Lop Nur is where China started its nuclear weapons program back in the 1960s.

Story continues below advertisement

China and the U.S. both signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) back in 1996, but neither of them actually ratified it to bring it into force. China insists it’s been following the treaty anyway, although it also maintains about 300 nuclear weapons for “defensive” purposes.

Russia, France and Britain also signed the CTBT, which has no actual power under international law. It must be ratified before an inspection standard can be put into place.

The U.S. has not conducted nuclear tests since 1992.

The U.S. report says China blocked sensor transmissions meant to allow international monitors to watch for violations of the CTBT deal.

There was a transmission interruption that began in 2018 and lasted until last August, a spokesperson for the watchdog CTBT Organization told the Wall Street Journal. However, there have been no interruptions since that last one ended.

Story continues below advertisement

A senior U.S. official told Reuters that the report shows why China should be brought into a broader arms control deal with the United States and Russia.

“The pace and manner by which the Chinese government is modernizing its stockpile is worrying, destabilizing and illustrates why China should be brought into the global arms control framework,” said the senior U.S. official on condition of anonymity.

The New START agreement between the U.S. and Russia limits both nations to a stockpile of no more than 1,550 nuclear weapons. That deal is due to expire in February 2021, and a replacement pact has not yet been set up.

With files from Reuters and the Associated Press

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article