Advertisement

Flint water crisis: Lawyers urge Michigan Supreme Court to let residents sue officials

Click to play video 'Michigan looking to improve water quality standards in wake of Flint crisis' Michigan looking to improve water quality standards in wake of Flint crisis
WATCH: Michigan looking to improve water quality standards in wake of Flint crisis – Jun 20, 2018

Lawyers urged the Michigan Supreme Court on Wednesday to clear the way for Flint residents to sue state officials over lead-contaminated water.

The case at the state’s highest court is one of many in state and federal courts over the scandal. What’s unique, however, is that it could break ground in exposing public officials to liability over alleged violations of the state constitution.

Justice Stephen Markman peppered lawyers on both sides with questions, acknowledging that the Flint water crisis was a “terrible harm.” But not every harm, he added, violates the constitution and deserves a remedy.

READ MORE: How lead levels in 5 Canadian cities compared to those in Flint, Mich.

The attorney general’s office is appealing a 2018 decision by the state appeals court, which said that Flint residents could pursue a violation of their right to “bodily integrity.”

Story continues below advertisement

Julie Hurwitz, an attorney for a large potential class of Flint residents, said the case involves tainted water but the issue is much broader: a right to have government tell citizens the truth.

“If we cannot hold this state liable for its role in perpetuating an ongoing invasion of poison in our communities, I would suggest our constitution would not be worth the paper it’s written on,” Hurwitz said.

Click to play video 'Is Montreal’s lead pipe problem worse than Flint Michigan’s?' Is Montreal’s lead pipe problem worse than Flint Michigan’s?
Is Montreal’s lead pipe problem worse than Flint Michigan’s? – Nov 4, 2019

Flint used water from the Flint River in 2014-15 without treating it to reduce a corrosive effect on old pipes. As a result, lead leached into the system. The river was supposed to be a temporary step while a pipeline was built to Lake Huron.

A panel appointed by then-Gov. Rick Snyder said the Snyder administration was “fundamentally accountable” for the crisis because of decisions made by environmental regulators.

Story continues below advertisement

In remarks to the Supreme Court, Assistant Attorney General Nate Gambill said the appeals court ruling should be overturned. He’s representing Snyder and two state departments.

READ MORE: Charges dropped in Flint water crisis after 3 year-probe

“There is no policy maker who authorized or mandated that low-level staffers go out and expose the plaintiffs to toxic water,” Gambill argued.

Justice Richard Bernstein said the case will determine if Flint residents can at least get a foot in the courthouse.

“That’s the only thing before us,” Bernstein said.