Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Quebec has no plans to appeal ruling that struck down parts of assisted dying law

WATCH: The Quebec government says it will not appeal the ruling from a superior court judge that states sections of the provincial law on assisted dying are unconstitutional. Global's Gloria Henriquez reports – Oct 3, 2019

The Quebec government says it won’t appeal a court ruling striking down sections of the provincial law on medically assisted dying deemed unconstitutional.

Story continues below advertisement

In a decision rendered last month, Quebec Superior Court Justice Christine Baudouin ruled in favour of two Quebecers struck by incurable degenerative diseases who had argued both the federal and provincial laws were too restrictive.

READ MORE: Does Canada’s assisted dying law need change? Federal leaders weigh in

Baudouin ruled invalid the Criminal Code requirement that a natural death be “reasonably foreseeable” before someone can be eligible for assisted death as well as the provincial requirement that people “be at the end of life.”

The daily email you need for 's top news stories.

Justice Minister Sonia LeBel and Health Minister Danielle McCann told a news conference today they have not decided whether the contested section of the Quebec law will be redrafted, adding that the government will separately study broadening access to the procedure.

The plaintiffs in the case, Nicole Gladu and Jean Truchon, had argued the provisions led to their requests under the law being denied.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Quebec court hands down ‘robust rejection’ of assisted dying criteria. Here’s what to know

Baudouin suspended the application of the judgment for six months to give federal and provincial legislators a chance to modify the laws, granting an exemption to Gladu and Truchon to seek medical aid in dying during this period if they satisfy other legal conditions.

The judge wrote that the laws in place had deprived them of the right to have “a dignified and serene death.”

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article