July 2, 2019 6:37 pm
Updated: July 3, 2019 12:49 am

Arizona governor withdraws incentive for Nike plant after Betsy Ross flag shoe recall

WATCH ABOVE: NIKE pulls shoes with Betsy Ross flag

A A

Arizona‘s governor on Tuesday withdrew a $1 million incentive for Nike Inc to build a plant in the state after the world’s largest sportswear maker canceled release of a sneaker featuring a colonial-era version of the American flag, which critics say reflects links to slavery.

Governor Doug Ducey, a Republican, said Nike‘s move was a “terrible decision.”

READ MORE: Can you be plus-size and healthy? Nike’s new mannequins spark debate

Nike recalled the shoe after former NFL quarterback and Nike pitchman Colin Kaepernick asked the company not to sell a shoe with a symbol that he and others consider offensive because of its connection to an era of slavery, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.

WATCH: What happens when brands take a social stand?

 

Nike had planned to release a new version of the Air Max 1 sneaker ahead of the Fourth of July holiday that featured a version of the U.S. flag with 13 white stars representing the first U.S. colonies. The flag is commonly known as the “Betsy Ross flag.”

“Words cannot express my disappointment at this terrible decision. I am embarrassed for Nike,” Ducey said in a series of tweets on the recall.

Story continues below

“Instead of celebrating American history the week of our nation’s independence, Nike has apparently decided that Betsy Ross is unworthy, and has bowed to the current onslaught of political correctness and historical revisionism,” he said.

Nike, whose shares ended down marginally at $84.96, released a statement explaining its decision to yank the product.

READ MORE: Colin Kaepernick will play in the NFL again, his lawyer predicts

“We regularly make business decisions to withdraw initiatives, products and services,” the company said. “NIKE made the decision to halt distribution of the Air Max 1 Quick Strike Fourth of July based on concerns that it could unintentionally offend and detract from the nation’s patriotic holiday.”

WATCH: Nike slammed for freezing pregnant athletes’ pay

 

The Beaverton, Oregon-based company is one of a slew of retailers that have faced major backlash over products that draw criticism for being racially insensitive. In December, Prada pulled products accused of depicting blackface. On Monday, reality TV star and businesswoman Kim Kardashian said she would rename her Kimono shapewear line after people in Japan said her use of the term was disrespectful.

Ducey, who was joined by many conservatives including Republican Senator Ted Cruz in expressing his disappointment toward Nike, said he had ordered the state’s commerce authority to withdraw all financial incentives under its discretion for the company’s plant.

READ MORE: NFL settles collusion grievances with Colin Kaepernick and Eric Reid

Nike was eligible for up to a $1 million grant, a spokeswoman at the Arizona Commerce Authority said, for a $185 million plant in Goodyear, Arizona, that would employ over 500 people.

Kaepernick last year became the face of Nike‘s advertisement marking the 30th anniversary of the company’s “Just Do It” slogan.

WATCH: Trump says anthem demonstrations could have been avoided if NFL suspended Kapernick

 

The ad revived a raging debate in the United States that started in 2016 when Kaepernick, then with the San Francisco 49ers, began kneeling to protest multiple police shootings of unarmed black men.

Since then, the company’s stock has risen about 4% as of Monday’s close. This year, Nike‘s shares are up 15%.

READ MORE: Nike shoes burn on social media as Colin Kaepernick features in ‘Just Do It’ campaign

One industry expert recalled Nike experiencing “one of its best quarters” after the Kaepernick campaign launch and said the chances of this sneaker controversy hurting company sales, which total roughly $39 billion annually, were “largely nil.”

“I think it’s important to understand who Nike‘s core demographic is here,” said Matt Powell, senior industry adviser at NPD. “They’re really focused on teens and looking at the commentary on Twitter and so forth. I don’t see a lot of teens coming out with a negative attitude here.”

© 2019 Reuters

Report an error

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.