Advertisement

Joshua Boyle trial delayed after Supreme Court ruling on sexual history

Click to play video: 'Joshua Boyle on trial for assaulting estranged wife'
Joshua Boyle on trial for assaulting estranged wife
Crown lawyer Meaghan Cunningham said during the trial it would be a mistake to conclude Caitlan Coleman was a willing participant in her husband's physical and sexual abuse – Mar 25, 2019

The sexual assault trial of former Afghanistan hostage Joshua Boyle was held up Tuesday while lawyers considered how a new Supreme Court ruling will impact the case.

Boyle, 35, has pleaded not guilty to offences allegedly committed against his wife, Caitlan Coleman, after they were freed following nearly six years in captivity.

READ MORE: Joshua Boyle trial on hold as estranged wife attempts to block sexual history as evidence

Coleman, who is now estranged from Boyle, was set to be cross-examined today following a weeks-long delay over what evidence of their sexual history could be raised by the defence.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

An Ontario Superior Court judge ruled in early June that Boyle’s lawyer could introduce some of that history, which is unusual in sexual assault cases.

WATCH BELOW: Ex-Afghan hostage’s estranged wife testifies

Click to play video: 'Boyle trial: Ex-Afghan hostage’s estranged wife testifies'
Boyle trial: Ex-Afghan hostage’s estranged wife testifies

However, this morning Judge Peter Doody asked the Crown and defence to consider if a Friday decision by the Supreme Court of Canada had any bearing on sexual history evidence already given by Coleman during direct testimony in March.

Story continues below advertisement

The Supreme Court ordered a new trial for a man acquitted of sexual assault, saying the past sexual relationship between the alleged victim and the accused should not have been entered into evidence and refined the rules for when such evidence is acceptable.

Sponsored content

AdChoices