Advertisement

Crown doesn’t need to prove crew member meant to kill missing passengers: judge

Karl Lilgert arrives at B.C. Supreme Court in downtown Vancouver, B.C., Thursday, January, 17, 2013. Lilgert was the navigation officer aboard a B.C. ferry that sank off the northwest coast of B.C. seven years ago, leading to the deaths of two passengers. Jonathan Hayward/The Canadian Press

VANCOUVER – The judge in the trial into the Queen of the North ferry sinking has told the jury not to jump to conclusions about a crew member’s guilt based solely on the fact that two passengers may have died.

Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein is continuing her instructions to the jury at the trial of Karl Lilgert, who was in charge of navigating the ferry which struck an island and sank in March 2006 off B.C.’s northern coast.

Get daily Canada news delivered to your inbox so you'll never miss the day's top stories.

Get daily National news

Get daily Canada news delivered to your inbox so you'll never miss the day's top stories.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Stromberg-Stein is outlining the evidence presented during the four-month trial, as well as detailing the law that relates to the charge of criminal negligence.

The judge says for a conviction, the Crown must prove Lilgert acted with “wanton and reckless disregard” for the safety of the people aboard the ferry, and that his actions were substantially different than what a reasonable person in his circumstances would have done.

Stromberg-Stein says the Crown doesn’t need to prove Lilgert meant to kill or harm the two missing passengers, or even that he knew they would disappear, but only that he should have anticipated the risk.

Story continues below advertisement

Lilgert is charged with two counts of criminal negligence causing death, though the jury can also consider the lesser charge of dangerous operation of a vessel.

Sponsored content

AdChoices