Advertisement

How Michael Flynn helped Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation

Robert Mueller recommends no prison for Michael Flynn, citing cooperation
WATCH: Robert Mueller recommends no prison for Michael Flynn, citing cooperation

Michael Flynn provided assistance so “substantial” to the Special Counsel Office’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election that he should be spared prison time, a sentencing report about the ex-national security advisor said Tuesday.

Flynn partook in 19 interviews with the office of special counsel Robert Mueller or lawyers from other Department of Justice (DOJ) offices, the report said.

Coverage of Michael Flynn on Globalnews.ca:

Story continues below advertisement

He could have faced anywhere between zero and six months in prison after he gave false statements to “numerous DOJ entities” regarding his contacts with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. after the election, as well as his work with the Republic of Turkey.

But because Flynn was so helpful, the Special Counsel’s Office said he should face a sentence that “does not impose a term of incarceration.”

READ MORE: Mueller to release sentencing report on Michael Flynn, expected to shed light on Russia probe

That assistance was spelled out in a heavily-redacted addendum to the sentencing report.

It said Flynn was helpful on two matters: an unspecified criminal investigation, the details of which were completely blacked out, and the SCO’s investigation into Russian interference.

Flynn assisted the SCO’s investigation on a “range of issues, including interactions between individuals in the presidential transition team and Russia.”

Michael Flynn, the former National Security Advisor to U.S. President Donald J. Trump, walks into the Federal courthouse in Washington, DC, USA, 10 July 2018.
Michael Flynn, the former National Security Advisor to U.S. President Donald J. Trump, walks into the Federal courthouse in Washington, DC, USA, 10 July 2018. EPA/JIM LO SCALZO via AP

That sentence contained more detail, but the rest of it was redacted.

Story continues below advertisement

The addendum noted that Flynn had communicated with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. as a representative of the president’s transition team.

READ MORE: Trump ally Roger Stone pleads 5th Amendment, snubs Senate request for documents

It said he spoke with the ambassador on two matters: one was sanctions and other measures imposed on Russia by the Obama administration following interference in the 2016 election, the other was a United Nations Security Council vote on a resolution that called on Israel to stop erecting settlements in Palestinian lands.

“Several senior members of the transition team publicly repeated false information conveyed to them by the defendant about communications between him and the Russian ambassador regarding the sanctions,” the addendum said.

Any further details about Flynn’s assistance were blacked out.

The addendum praised Flynn’s timeliness in coming forward, saying he started providing the government with information “not long after the government first sought his cooperation.”

“His early cooperation was particularly valuable because he was one of the few people with long-term and firsthand insight regarding events and issues under investigation by the SCO,” it said.

In this Dec. 1, 2017, file photo, former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn leaves federal court in Washington.
In this Dec. 1, 2017, file photo, former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn leaves federal court in Washington. AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File

In deciding on the sentence that Flynn should face, prosecutors took note of his extensive history in the military and public service.

Story continues below advertisement

They noted that he spent 33 years in the military, with five years on combat duty, leading the Defense Intelligence Agency and retiring as a three-star lieutenant general.

“The defendant’s extensive government service distinguish him from every other person who has been charged as part of the SCO’s investigation,” the sentencing report said.

Nevertheless, his government service “should have made him particularly aware of the harm caused by providing false information to the government, as well as the rules governing work performed on behalf of a foreign government.”