The Supreme Court of Canada is upholding procedures that permit shortcuts in allowing a motorist’s breathalyzer sample into evidence — even in cases where taking the sample may have been unlawful.
In a decision Thursday, the court is affirming the existing charter process for challenging police actions in obtaining a sample.
The high court’s 5-4 ruling comes in the case of Dion Henry Alex, who was stopped by police in Penticton, B.C., in April 2012.
Get daily National news
Alex failed a roadside test and was taken to the police detachment, where he blew above the legal blood alcohol limit in two subsequent tests.
At issue was the continuing relevance of a 1976 Supreme Court decision that said the Crown did not need to prove the demand for a breath test was lawful in order to rely on evidentiary shortcuts about the accuracy of test readings.
- 11 charged in connection with events leading up to fatal police shooting of teen Nooran Rezayi
- N.B. seafood company reaches $225M deal to acquire salmon farming operations
- $87B Quebec plan aims for 77% of energy consumed in province by 2050 from renewables
- Evacuation order remains in place as glacial lake bursts near Pemberton
Following introduction of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the 1980s, the courts said that an argument a breath sample was obtained unlawfully must come in the form of a charter challenge against unreasonable search and seizure.
Comments
Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.