UN concerned about rise of ‘fake news,’ threats against media

Click to play video 'President Trump responds to ‘Fake News!’ cry during CPAC speech' President Trump responds to ‘Fake News!’ cry during CPAC speech
WATCH: President Trump responds to ‘Fake News!’ cry during CPAC speech – Feb 24, 2017

Experts monitoring freedom of expression at the United Nations and key regional organizations expressed concern Friday at the growing prevalence of “fake news” and propaganda – and alarm at public authorities denigrating the media as “lying” or “the opposition.”

In a joint declaration, the experts highlight the obligation of governments to foster freedom of expression and state that restrictions can only be imposed in accordance with international law – including to prohibit advocating hatred and incitement to violence, discrimination or hostility.

David Kaye, the UN special investigator on freedom of opinion and expression, said “‘fake news’ has emerged as a global topic of concern and there is a risk that efforts to counter it could lead to censorship, the suppression of critical thinking and other approaches contrary to human rights law.”

WATCH: Trump says media should be banned from using anonymous sources

Click to play video 'Trump says media should be banned from using anonymous sources' Trump says media should be banned from using anonymous sources
Trump says media should be banned from using anonymous sources – Feb 24, 2017

The declaration identifies general principles to deal with disinformation, “fake news” and propaganda. And it includes human rights standards, encourages the promotion of diversity and plurality in the media, and emphasizes the roles of journalists, media outlets and digital intermediaries, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

The declaration was also signed by monitors of freedom of expression at the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the Organization of American States, and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

The joint declaration doesn’t name any countries or leaders. But it follows repeated outbursts by U.S. President Donald Trump against “the fake news media” which he accuses of being “the enemy of the American people.”

READ MORE: Donald Trump brands mainstream media ‘enemy of the American people’

The declaration emphasizes that “some forms of disinformation and propaganda may harm individual reputations and privacy, or incite to violence, discrimination or hostility against identifiable groups in society.”

It encourages the media and civil society to identify and raise awareness about “deliberately false news stories, disinformation and propaganda.”

But the declaration also expresses alarm at instances “where public authorities denigrate, intimidate and threaten the media, including by stating that the media is ‘the opposition’ or is ‘lying’ and has a hidden political agenda.”

READ MORE: Donald Trump renews campaign vows, declares war on media in Florida rally

This “increases the risk of threats and violence against journalists, undermines public trust and confidence in journalism as a public watchdog, and may mislead the public by blurring the lines between disinformation and media products containing independently verifiable facts,” the declaration says.

Story continues below advertisement

The experts stress that government have an obligation to foster an environment for freedom of expression including promoting, protecting and supporting diverse media.

The declaration deplores attempts by some governments to suppress dissent and control communications using repressive rules on the operation of media outlets and other measures.

READ MORE: Some media blocked from White House briefing after Donald Trump attacks ‘fake news’ during CPAC speech

It says prohibitions on the dissemination of information “based on vague and ambiguous ideas, including ‘false news’ or non-objective information’, are incompatible with international standards for restrictions on freedom of expression.”

The declaration calls the blocking of entire websites, IP addresses, ports or network protocols by a government “an extreme measure which can only be justified where it is provided by law and is necessary to protect a human right or other legitimate public interest.”