Saskatchewan premier won’t sign on for new carbon tax

Click to play video: 'Is a carbon tax a good idea for Canada?' Is a carbon tax a good idea for Canada?
WATCH ABOVE: Is a carbon tax a good idea for Canada? – Feb 22, 2016

Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall has announced that he will not sign any federal-provincial agreement which would include a new national carbon tax.

“In case you’re wondering, I won’t be signing any agreement that includes a national carbon tax,” the Saskatchewan Premier wrote on his Facebook wall Saturday.

Wall, who faces re-election this spring, believes the fragile Canadian economy, specifically the energy sector, may not be able to withstand the pressures a new federal tax could bring.

“With the energy sector reeling and the Canadian economy struggling, it is simply not the time for a new national tax,” he wrote.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau sits down with provincial and territorial leaders next Thursday in Vancouver to discuss a national climate strategy, after which a series of working groups under a six-month deadline will begin hammering out common approaches.

Story continues below advertisement

Among the most contentious areas of discussion will be establishing a national floor price on greenhouse gas emissions.

WATCH: Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall says “no” to federal carbon tax

Click to play video: 'Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall says “no” to federal carbon tax' Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall says “no” to federal carbon tax
Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall says “no” to federal carbon tax – Feb 19, 2016

Six other provinces, meanwhile, have already adopted carbon pricing, are in the process of doing so, or have announced their intention to pursue the policy.

Catherine McKenna, the federal environment minister, said Friday in an interview that setting a carbon price is just one climate measure among many, but called it “really important.”

“It’s interesting that large businesses are calling for a price on carbon because they see that as the most efficient way to reduce emissions, to foster innovation and also to provide certainty,” said McKenna.

“Most big energy companies have an internal price on carbon (already), because they know this is going to happen.”

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Wall suggests there might be options for SaskPower around national carbon tax

Working groups coming out of next week’s first ministers meeting will “tackle some pretty tough issues,” she said, including carbon pricing, climate change mitigation, specific carbon reduction measures, adaptation, and clean technology development.

Transportation is a big source of Canadian emissions that needs to be addressed, said McKenna, citing electric vehicles as a “direction we want to be going.”

Buildings can be much more energy efficient, and there’s a role for governments in major green infrastructure projects and in fostering innovation.

“There’s going to be a package of measures at the end of the six-month process that will be real actions to reduce emissions,” said McKenna. “One of those is a price on carbon.”

One scenario being sounded out within the federal government envisions setting a one-year time frame for provinces to establish a minimum price on carbon emissions through their own provincial policies. Any province or territory not on board by the following year would face a federally imposed, B.C.-style carbon tax.

WATCH: What exactly is a carbon tax?


Click to play video: 'What exactly is a carbon tax?' What exactly is a carbon tax?
What exactly is a carbon tax? – Feb 23, 2016

But ongoing uncertainty stems from the differing carbon pricing models already in play in Canada. Quebec’s cap-and-trade market with California, which Ontario will join in 2017, has a current carbon price of about $17 a tonne. British Columbia’s carbon tax is currently $30 per tonne. Ontario and Quebec officials argue the hard emissions “caps” of their system mean they get the same carbon reductions at between $15-$18 per tonne that B.C.’s tax achieves at $30.

Story continues below advertisement

As McKenna put it Friday, “the devil’s in the details.”

With files from Canadian Press


Sponsored content