Advertisement

What you need to know about ‘shadow flipping’ in Vancouver

Click to play video 'Clark promises to end shadow-flipping in Vancouver’s hot real estate market' Clark promises to end shadow-flipping in Vancouver’s hot real estate market
WATCH: Premier Christy Clark is promising to close a loophole allowing shadow-flipping in Metro Vancouver's hot real estate market. But will make it a difference? Jill Bennett investigates, and Keith Baldrey looks at other ideas being floated to make housing more affordable – Mar 18, 2016

VANCOUVER – British Columbia’s housing industry has been jolted by allegations that real estate agents are taking part in so-called shadow flipping.

The controversial practice involves brokers reselling a property multiple times before a deal closes and profiting from each transfer using the assignment clause in sales contracts. Here’s a look at how it operates – and why it matters:

What is an assignment clause?

An assignment clause is a contract provision included in some real estate transactions that allows a buyer to resell or transfer a property to another buyer before the deal’s closing date.

Why was it created in the first place?

The assignment clause was originally intended to give buyers a legal way of backing out of a purchase if for some reason their circumstances changed after they had put an offer on a property, instead of having to surrender their deposit. The clause was also meant to protect sellers, ensuring a sale would still go forward as long as another buyer could be found.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: The president of Vancouver’s Real Estate Board discusses possible abuse of the assignment clause

Click to play video 'Allegations of misconduct in real estate market' Allegations of misconduct in real estate market
Allegations of misconduct in real estate market – Feb 9, 2016

What is the issue?

The assignment clause allows real estate agents to sell a contract for a single property multiple times at increasingly higher prices as they make a commission on each transfer. Buyers in the middle also benefit by pocketing the difference between what they paid and the resale value. They also don’t pay any land-transfer taxes because the entire transaction happens before the deal officially closes, so the property is never technically in their possession.

What is the end result?

The original seller receives less than what the property ends up being worth and the last buyer may be paying an inflated price, with the difference in value going to the real estate agent and the buyers in the middle.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: As John Hua reports, there are fears nothing will be resolved unless an independent body is involved

Click to play video 'Concerns raised about investigation into Vancouver real estate' Concerns raised about investigation into Vancouver real estate
Concerns raised about investigation into Vancouver real estate – Feb 9, 2016

A hypothetical example:
A real estate agent’s client reaches a deal to sell a property to an initial buyer for $1 million. The agent then takes that contract and resells it to a second buyer for $1.5 million. The agent in turn goes to a third and final buyer and sells the contract for $1.8 million.

For each transaction the agent receives a commission. The initial seller receives $1 million minus the agent’s commission. The first buyer who bought the contract for the property for $1 million and sold it for $1.5 million pockets $500,000. The second buyer who bought the contract for $1.5 million and sold it for $1.8 million gets $300,000. The third buyer pays the land-transfer tax on the $1.8 million purchase price.

Story continues below advertisement

Rapid home flipping in Vancouver: ‘Maybe this is when it will be caught’

WATCH: Gordon Houlden, Director of the China Institute, discusses what Vancouver can learn from other places that have tried to curb the impact of foreign money on local real estate prices

Click to play video 'Q&A on Vancouver’s real estate controversy' Q&A on Vancouver’s real estate controversy
Q&A on Vancouver’s real estate controversy – Feb 10, 2016