WASHINGTON – Lyme disease conjures memories of checking for ticks at camp and fretting over bug bites after hikes in the woods. But far from a summertime nuisance, Lyme is a potentially debilitating disease – and the subject of a vigorous debate in modern medicine.
READ MORE: Ticks and Lyme disease – what you need to know
Doctors not only debate how to treat the disease, which starts with fever and rash but can develop into long-term problems such as fatigue, arthritis and concentration problems. After decades, they still argue over the standard test for Lyme, which is subject to severe limitations. The conflict has given rise to a cottage industry of alternative Lyme physicians, laboratories, medical guidelines and even research centres at universities.
Here’s a look at the debate surrounding Lyme disease, which infects an estimated 300,000 people in the U.S. annually.
Q: How does the blood test work?
Lyme disease is caused by a strain of bacteria carried by certain ticks, primarily found in Northeast and Midwestern U.S. and parts of Europe. But the only U.S.-recommended Lyme test doesn’t detect the bacteria. Instead, it measures the immune system’s response to Lyme in the form of antibodies, proteins that help fight infections. While it’s the best approach available, experts acknowledge it is fraught with problems of accuracy and interpretation: The test usually comes back negative even several weeks after infection. Yet the test also can show a positive result years after infection, even after successful antibiotic treatment.
“We don’t have a way of telling, once we put you on therapy, how successful that has been,” says Dr. John Branda, of Harvard Medical School.
WATCH: Explaining the mysteries of Lyme disease
The test’s inability to detect early-stage Lyme isn’t a problem for patients who display the signature bull’s eye rash caused by disease-carrying ticks – guidelines instruct doctors to skip the test and treat those patients with antibiotics. But as many as 30 per cent of those infected never get the rash, leaving doctors to diagnose the disease based on symptoms and patients’ recollections of possible exposure.
Q: Is there really no other way to test?
A host of independent laboratories, such as Advanced Laboratory Services in Sharon Hill, Pennsylvania, sell alternative tests claiming to be able to detect the bacteria directly.
But scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been unable to reproduce their results. And a CDC paper published last year suggested the company’s findings may have been marred by laboratory contamination.
- Canadian man dies during Texas Ironman event. His widow wants answers as to why
- ‘Sciatica was gone’: hospital performs robot-assisted spinal surgery in Canadian first
- Canadians more likely to eat food past best-before date. What are the risks?
- Invasive strep: ‘Don’t wait’ to seek care, N.S. woman warns on long road to recovery
Mainstream experts say inaccurate alternative Lyme tests lead to over diagnosis and costs hundreds of dollars, since insurance doesn’t pay for them. Yet patients request them.
READ MORE: Climate change may be reason ticks are spreading across Canada
“Patients are so convinced they have Lyme disease that there’s a demand for tests that will prove they have it,” says Dr. Paul Lantos, an infectious disease specialist at Duke University Medical Center.
Laboratories that develop alternative tests for Lyme are not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, unlike traditional test manufacturers. But last year the FDA said the growing number of so-called “home brew” tests – estimated at 11,000 for all sorts of diseases – demanded closer attention.
“We have concerns that people can be misled and act on information that may or may not have validity,” says Katherine Serrano, an FDA deputy division director.
Under a 2014 proposal, FDA would require labs to begin demonstrating the accuracy of their tests, including those for Lyme disease. The proposal has not yet been finalized. Serrano says the FDA would take a risk-based approach to reviewing tests, meaning tests for diseases like cancer would likely come before conditions like Lyme. She estimates it could be more than five years before FDA begins reviewing alternative Lyme tests.
Q. But at least doctors agree on how to treat Lyme, right?
Mainstream medical authorities say bacteria that cause Lyme can be eliminated with 2 to 4 weeks of antibiotics.
But self-described “Lyme literate” physicians recommend a variety of other treatments; a paper published by Lantos and his colleagues in May identifies over 30 advertised online, including lasers, magnets and dietary supplements.
The most popular alternative involves long-term intravenous antibiotics for patients with lingering symptoms – sometimes multiple drugs for years.
At the core of that approach is a controversial concept called chronic Lyme disease. Doctors who diagnose the condition believe patients who have extended symptoms like arthritis and fatigue are still, in fact, infected with Lyme bacteria.
READ MORE: Uptake of Lyme disease cases in Canada, experts warn
Five studies from the U.S. and Europe failed to show lasting benefits from extended antibiotic therapy. And researchers point to serious potential complications, including allergic reactions, infections and life-threatening diarrhea.
Still, doctors who diagnose chronic Lyme say some patients respond to extended antibiotics. They argue that Lyme cases vary and care must be customized to each patient.
“We’re interpreting the literature in a different way that we feel is responsible and helping others,” says Dr. Samuel Shor, president elect of the International Lyme and Associated Disease Society, the leading group for alternative Lyme practitioners.
Q: Many patients diagnosed with chronic Lyme have never had any confirmable signs of the disease – rash or a positive blood test. If their symptoms aren’t due to Lyme, what causes them?
Experts do not yet have an answer. They point out that symptoms like arthritis and cognitive problems overlap with other little-understood conditions like fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
“I think there are people who are just desperate for help,” said Dr. Paul Auwaerter of Johns Hopkins University. “And doctors who may be well-meaning try and help these people, but they’re helping them with a paradigm that is false.”
Comments