REGINA – The Saskatchewan government and agriculture groups in Western Canada say federal legislation aimed at increasing the movement of grain doesn’t go far enough.
The legislation introduced Wednesday would amend the Canada Grain Act and the Canada Transportation Act in a bid to clear grain that has been sitting in bins across the Prairies because of a rail transportation bottleneck.
Saskatchewan Agriculture Minister Lyle Stewart says in a letter to federal Transport Minister Lisa Raitt and Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz that the province is disappointed.
“The transportation problems over the last several months negatively impacted producer returns and severely eroded Canada’s export reputation as customers sought out more reliable sources for their grain,” Stewart wrote Thursday.
“Given the critical nature of the problem and the railway’s historical behaviour, our government believed more aggressive steps were required.”
Stewart also said he thinks ‘the railways came out the big winners’ in the legislation.
The proposed law would allow the Canadian Grain Commission to regulate how much a grain company would have to pay a farmer if the company didn’t meet delivery dates set out in a contract.
It also aims to extend what are called inter-switching limits from 30 kilometres to 160 kilometres in Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Most grain elevators on the Prairies are only served by one railway and the federal government says expanding inter-switching would allow more service by more rail companies.
Another change would enshrine a previous government order for Canadian National and Canadian Pacific railways to move a minimum amount of grain or face a penalty of up to $100,000 a day.
Get breaking National news
Stewart told reporters at the legislature that one of his biggest concerns is that the legislation ends in August 2016.
“It can be renewed by the government in power at their whim, but that doesn’t give much of a sense of security to producers or shippers,” he said.
“And I don’t think it gives much guidance to railways as to what they really need to do as far as reinvesting in equipment and rolling stock and that sort of thing. That to us is a substantial deficiency.”
Franck Groeneweg, chairman of SaskCanola, said the legislation is a good first step to help move grain to ports, but more is needed.
The 2016 sunset clause worries him too.
“We don’t want to make it a Band-Aid for the short term here. We want a permanent solution, something that’s going to help all of the Canadian economy really,” he said.
Groeneweg, who farms in Edgeley, Sask., northeast of Regina, said he had contracts that were made in September for delivery in January, but a lot of that grain is still sitting on his land. That means he’s waiting for the income to pay his bills.
The Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association said there are some good things in the legislation such as the inter-switching change.
But it’s not enough to adequately tackle the backlog in grain shipments, the association suggested.
“Grain prices to farmers will remain artificially depressed until the backlog is cleared up and the elevator system has the capacity available to offer competitive bids for our grain,” association president Levi Wood said in a news release.
“As long as the elevator system remains plugged, price offers to farmers are likely to remain below market value.”
CN and CP have blamed the backlog on the record size of the harvest and extremely cold weather. The companies have said they had to use shorter trains during freezing temperatures to ensure brakes could be used properly and that meant less capacity.
CN said Wednesday that it was disturbed by Canadian government legislation introducing heavy-handed regulatory intrusion into rail grain transportation.
President and CEO Claude Mongeau said an outsized crop and winter conditions were beyond the company’s control. The legislation does not address the root cause of the current grain situation and will do little to move more grain, now or in the future, he said.
Comments