While a focus of Oct. 19 has been on the question whether Alberta should hold a referendum on separating from Canada, there are several other questions Premier Danielle Smith is putting to residents.
Some revolve around immigration, while others are constitutional reforms Smith is asking the province to consider.
Here are the questions the premier is sending to a provincewide vote on Oct. 19.
Question 1: Do you support the government of Alberta taking increased control over immigration for the purposes of decreasing immigration to more sustainable levels, prioritizing economic migration and giving Albertans first priority on new employment opportunities?
What you need to know: Smith has said she wants to see Alberta have a similar accord as Quebec, which has an agreement with Ottawa that lets the province set its own eligibility requirements for economic migrants.
She said in February a “normal” and “sustainable” level of immigration would represent less than one per cent of the population, or about 50,000 newcomers per year, but critics have said Smith has failed to plan for the population growth it invited with a countrywide ad campaign in recent years.
Question 2: Do you support the government of Alberta introducing a law mandating that only Canadian citizens, permanent residents and individuals with an Alberta-approved immigration status will be eligible for provincially funded programs, such as health care, education and other social services?
What you need to know: The premier has blamed overburdened public services on rapid population growth in the past five years.
The government’s website claims temporary residents cost the province more than $1 billion in health care, education and social services, but critics say those numbers don’t add up, and the government is ignoring the economic contributions and benefits they bring to Alberta.
The specific effect of a yes vote is unclear, since the government says it won’t define “Alberta-approved immigration status” until after the referendum.
Question 3: Assuming that all Canadian citizens and permanent residents continue to qualify for social support programs as they do now, do you support the government of Alberta introducing a law requiring all individuals with a non-permanent legal immigration status to reside in Alberta for at least 12 months before qualifying for any provincially funded social support programs?
Get breaking National news
What you need to know: The government says it won’t determine which programs would be affected until after the referendum, should Albertans vote yes.
Temporary workers are already ineligible for some provincial programs, such as Assured Income for the Severely Handicapped, and the Canadian Bar Association’s provincial chapter says this could run afoul of the Canada Health Act or the Charter’s equality provisions.
Question 4: Assuming that all Canadian citizens and permanent residents continue to qualify for public health care and education as they do now, do you support the government of Alberta charging a reasonable fee or premium to individuals with a non-permanent immigration status living in Alberta for their and their family’s use of the health care and education systems?
What you need to know: A potential new charge won’t be determined by the government until after the vote, though the premier told Calgary business leaders on Sept. 22 that a health premium could be as much as $1,900.
Education leaders in the province have come out against restricting access to schooling, saying it goes against internationally agreed-to children’s rights.
Question 5: Do you support the government of Alberta introducing a law requiring individuals to provide proof of citizenship, such as a passport, birth certificate, or citizenship card, to vote in an Alberta provincial election?
What you need to know: Voting is already restricted to Canadian citizens and both Elections Canada and Elections Alberta have reported very few cases of ineligible voting.
Smith has said it’s about strengthening the integrity of provincial elections, but critics say this policy will only make lineups at the polls more time-consuming, and open the door to racial or ethnic bias at the voting booth.
Question 6: Do you support the government of Alberta working with the governments of other willing provinces to amend the Canadian Constitution to have provincial governments, and not the federal government, select the justices appointed to provincial King’s Bench and Appeal courts?
What you need to know: If approved by voters, this proposal would only commit Alberta’s government to working with other provinces and federal lawmakers to make changes to the Canadian Constitution.
Constitutional changes generally need approval from seven provincial legislatures covering 50 per cent of Canada’s population, as well as from the House of Commons and Senate in Ottawa.
Question 7: Do you support the government of Alberta working with the governments of other willing provinces to amend the Canadian Constitution to abolish the unelected federal Senate?
What you need to know: Abolishing the Senate would be even more difficult than other general constitutional amendments. It would need to be unanimously approved by all provinces and ratified by the Senate and the House of Commons.
Question 8: Do you support the government of Alberta working with the governments of other willing provinces to amend the Canadian Constitution to allow provinces to opt out of federal programs that intrude on provincial jurisdiction such as health care, education and social services, without a province losing any of the associated federal funding for use in its social programs?
What you need to know: The federal “spending power” authority allows Ottawa to attach conditions to its funding for provinces, with health-care funding under the Canada Health Act being a key example.
A permanent provincial “opt-out” clause would require the Constitution be amended.
Question 9: Do you support the government of Alberta working with the governments of other willing provinces to amend the Canadian Constitution to better protect provincial rights from federal interference by giving a province’s laws dealing with provincial or shared areas of constitutional jurisdiction priority over federal laws when the province’s laws and federal laws conflict?
What you need to know: Under the Constitution, federal laws are given standing over provincial laws when jurisdictional issues arise.
This change to the Constitution would require approval from the Senate, the House of Commons and seven provinces representing at least half of the country’s population.
Question 10: Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?
What you need to know: Advocates for separation say the province needs to get out from under federal taxation and regulation, freeing up wealth and sparking economic development. Federalists say the split would only hurt businesses and saddle landlocked Alberta with debt and the massive cost of delivering formerly federal services.
Smith has framed her other nine other questions on immigration and constitutional reform as a political compromise that could address Alberta’s grievances, gain leverage with Ottawa and avoid dismantling the country.
—with files from Global News’ Sean Previl
Come on ALBERTANS , show ottawa how fcking much you HATE THEM!
@Jim , keep scking carnhole like your life depends on it
K4thy the con.
This is their thinking.
I would suggest that if you don’t understand the questions, you shouldn’t vote. Or to be safe, vote “yes”.
I agree the questions are convoluted and I also believe that’s on purpose. If you DO NOT UNDERSTAND what is being asked, then just vote NO.
Note to all colored people. Only ” real Canadian ” = white people.
RCMP or some other police dept need to reopen investigation into corruption that Smith and her members imported dodgy medicines from Turkey. She’s beating around the bush. The fact that there isn’t a local oil company or foreign investors wanted to invest in the pipeline because they don’t trust her tantrums and all that separation noises.
Blaming on immigrants but she and her UCP ran ads to lure them here. One of the UCP ministers on TV said, your foreign skills work here, you don’t need re-certified. No one else to blame but themselves for not seeing consequences of naive policy.
Question 1 should have been: Do you support Alberta stopping the equalization payments to Ottawa?
@ Linda F – It’s not really difficult. Smith has 4 questions that are attempting to redefine confederation with constitutional changes to appease the anti-Ottawa folks that vote UCP. She also has 5 anti-immigrant questions to appeal to the racists that vote UCP. Then there’s the separation choice: remain or commence whatever comes next.
No to the nine and remain.
These are convoluted questions. They are double sided and if the answer choices are Yes or No to, especially # 10, they will pick what answer they feel they want. If you have a definite choice on ballot to check, then that makes it different.
For the person that thinks I am an “elbozo” please reread my comment slowly, you will catch the gist then.
Separate, we pay since 1905, absolutely blue Sweet Eff All has changed or ever will change!!!!!!
Vote to separate from this sh * t hole of a country!
@ Try This – How about a different less biased opinion. Are there existing problems in Canada that Smith’s questions actually address or is this just Smith providing grist for the mill to placate the loud extremists in the UCP party?
I think she’s courting controversy to look like she is doing something for the angry cranks.
How about less biased opinion.
Need to know:
1. Should all provinces have the same say in immigration
2. Should non-Canadians get free health care, education, welfare.
3. Should immigrants live in Canada for 1 year before they qualify for aid? – Health act and Charter do not apply.
4. Can non-Canadians pay for services – Fair market value? The children have a right to education, not free education.
5. Sounds like Trump. Waste of time. = more red tape.
6. Should provincial judges be appointed by the province – sounds logical.
7. We want an equal, elected and effective senate. To abolish it would mean unequal representation of the provinces. – Is Smith not fighting for Alberta?
8. is just not thought out. Ottawa should not be funding provincial programs. Just distribute the money.
9. is just the tail wagging the dog. No to Queen Smith.
10. There are better ways. Smith just agreed to tie west coast pipeline to carbon capture and the dreaded carbon tax. – why did she agree, when she could have stood up for us?
@ Rodney Dangerfield – The unnatural hostility that needs to be reversed is the hostility some Albertans have towards immigrants and Ottawa.
The hostile, unnatural “migration” of Canada needs to be reversed.
Canada is a nation of immigrants. Vote no to those 5 immigration questions.
Preserve Canada’s federal structure. Vote no to those 4 constitutional questions.
Vote remain to the separation question.
End disingenuous Danielle Smith’s political career.
Find Online Jobs (500$-6000$ Weekly) safe and secure! Easy Acces To Information. Simple in use. All the Answers. Multiple sources combined. Fast and trusted. Discover us now! Easy & Fast, 99% Match.
.
Follow Here ………Www.PayAtHome1.Com
Question 0
Do voters answering these questions have to meet certain minimum universal standards of knowledge and competence regarding their content? If so, how would these be established? If not, why not?
Tgg we will vote
What ever we want. I will vote for alberta separation option so don’t tell anyone not to vote for #2 option you elbows up coc suxer
If you want the EU to control you do not vote for Option #2.
If you love having your taxes go through the roof to pay a corrupt EU, do not vote Option #2.
If you want the EU, which colonized Canada, to run your life, do not vote Option #2!
Question 11 time 9.07 I believe you enjoy taking it up the bung hole . It shows .as you are elbows up pants down in position for a liberal team bum stabbing
Question 11:
Do you agree that Danielle Smith is a useless skank?
Thanks for the information. I’ll switch several of my votes to ‘yes’ now.
Roman … better than ELBOWZO #1 !!! Wha haa haa haa! Educate thy self ! More uneducated voters here i c !!!
Give more control to Dani Smith?
Whahahahahahaha
Premier always wasting tax payer money
im gonna do a pro immigration, pro federal control, and anti separatist line.
doing anything otherwise is treason aganst humanity, and WILL be treated as such.
No to the nine.
Remain for #10
Come on ALBERTANS, show ottawa how fcking much you HATE THEM!
Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada should this not be 2 questions not one?
Since question 9 refers only to areas of either provincial jurisdiction, or shared jurisdiction, I suppose that it doesn’t really amount to dismantling the country. But it still seems like a wild dream to me. At first glance, I thought that questions 1 and 2 seemed reasonable enough, but on further reflection, I realized why things weren’t already that way.
I find it very interesting that every answer to the 10 questions is showing opposition rather than balancing out and showing what positives could come out of it. This article is very one sided. I will no longer read an article from global news any more. I prefer unbiased news media
The govenerment printed information books .and sent them by mail. If you scan the link with your phone it explains how to vote in many languages. So just incase they can’t read or speak English it explains how to vote. So this means they have as much rights to vote as a person that paid taxes for 50 years . Just walk in and get the same rights even on a work visa. This government needs to go f*** them selves. Canada is nothing more then a third world s*** hole now .thank the liberal government
These questions will confuse many people, so the answers to select from will need to be explicit.
A lot of people want to have the Federal Government control everything in their lives. They are scared of taking control of their own lives because maybe they will do something wrong.
1 to 9: No
Ten: Option 1
Doesn’t matter i am voting for separation and immigration control