Voters in three federal ridings are being courted this summer by candidates hoping to fill vacant seats in the House of Commons.
There are actually four ridings without an MP right now, but only three byelections. Why didn’t Prime Minister Mark Carney call four?
The answer is a bit complicated, but the bottom line is that Liberal strategists would clearly have advised the prime minister that, given the unique political circumstances of the ridings that are currently vacant, the Liberals could give themselves a boatload more money to spend fighting off the Bloc Québecois in one vacant Québec seat by calling three byelections while depriving the BQ of cash it could use by holding off on that fourth by-election to fill a second vacant Québec seat.
The three byelections currently underway are in the B.C. riding of North Vancouver-Capilano, the Ontario riding of Beaches-East York, and the Québec riding of Chicoutimi-Le Fjord. The other Québec riding that’s vacant is Saint Hyacinthe-Bagot-Acton.
In North Van and Beaches, the Liberals are the incumbent party and are easy favourites to hold those seats, according to the Global News election model which is based on an aggregate of multiple public polls. That means the Liberals will not need to spend much to defend seats they won in 2025 by 26 and 44 percentage points, respectively.
The Bloc Québecois is the incumbent party in Saint Hyacinthe-Bagot-Acton and they should have no trouble holding that riding whenever that byelection will be held. In 2025, the BQ beat the second-place Liberals there by 10 points.
Chicoutimi-Le Fjord is different: in the 2025 general election, Conservative Richard Martel (now sitting as an independent senator) eked out a narrow win with 33.7 per cent of the popular vote versus 30.8 per cent for the BQ and 30.7 per cent for the Liberals. The Global News election model, aggregating Quebec-only results from eight national pollsters, has Chicoutimi right now as a three-way toss-up. Every vote there in the Aug. 31 byelection will count. And every dollar spent there by any party will make a difference.
Get daily National news
So, how much can parties spend? Federal election finance laws set two kinds of spending limits: one for local candidates and one for parties running candidates in each riding. The amount will vary in each riding depending on the number of electors in each riding. Last week, Elections Canada published the spending limits for each candidate. In North Van, each candidate is capped at $140,839.70; in Beaches-East York, it’s $134,454.45; and in Chicoutimi it’s $131,296.71. Candidates can only spend that allocated expense limit in the riding.
But the parties get additional spending headroom based on the number of candidates they are running in each riding up for grabs. The Bloc Québecois is running just one candidate, of course, in the three vacant ridings. The Liberals — and Conservatives and New Democrats — are running candidates in all three. And per Elections Canada’s rules: “A party with candidates in more than one electoral district may distribute its election expenses limit among the electoral districts as it sees fit.”
In other words, the Liberals can take the spending headroom they get for candidates running in safe seats in North Van and Beaches and pour all of that spending into the tight race in Chicoutimi. If Carney had called byelections in all four vacant ridings, and not just three, the Bloc could then have transferred spending limits from its safe seat in Saint-Hyacinthe to the tight race in Chicoutimi.
But Carney held off on the byelection in Saint-Hyacinthe, effectively denying the Bloc the financial resources it would almost certainly have used in Chicoutimi. For what it’s worth, Carney is not legally obligated to name a byelection date for Saint-Hyacinthe until the middle of December.
In any event, here’s what Elections Canada has allocated as expense limits for parties with registered candidates in all three ridings where there is a byelection underway: Chicoutimi – $99,139.01; Beaches – $107,639.28; North Van – $117,208.54.
- ‘Feverish optimism’ as borough commits to revitalizing Montreal’s Chinatown
- Canada’s foreign influence registry is now active. Here’s how it works
- Ottawa moves to list Alberta-backed West Coast pipeline as national interest project
- U.S. State Department closing consulates in Canada, Japan and Indonesia
So adding the party’s expense limit plus the candidate expense limit, the maximum amount the Bloc can spend to steal Chicoutimi from the Conservatives is about $229,000.
But the Liberals, Conservatives, and NDP — because they are running candidates in Ontario and BC — could spend up to $453,000 to win Chicoutimi: nearly twice as much as the Bloc.
Now, what about the Conservatives? Will that party transfer all the cash it’s allowed to spend in Ontario and BC to defend its 2025 win in Chicoutimi? Parties will never tell you how they spend their election cash but the answer would be a qualified “maybe.”
Embattled Conservative party leader Pierre Poilievre cannot afford to lose Chicoutimi and so one would assume the party will throw everything it can into the Québec contest. But holding what it has may not be good enough for Poilievre and the Conservatives. After losing five MPs to defections or the Senate in a year, Poilievre needs to show he can take the Liberals down a notch and the best chance of that happening is in North Vancouver where Carney’s former deputy chief of staff, Braeden Caley, is carrying the Liberal banner.
Now it’s unlikely the Conservative candidate in North Van – Stephen Curran — will beat Caley, but if Curran, who ran and lost to Jonathan Wilkinson in the same riding in the 2025 general election, can make it close, Conservatives could spin that as making progress against the Carney Liberals. But, a moral victory in North Van would not nearly offset the failure to achieve actual victory in holding on to Chicoutimi. Tough choice for the Tories.
Meanwhile, there are other subtle ways in which a governing party can remind a local electorate of the value of voting for one its members: on Wednesday, a Liberal MP who represents a downtown Montréal riding will travel hundreds of kilometres to the Saguenay region where Chicoutimi-Le Fjord is found to announce federal government funding for a critical minerals project in the region. Handing out Ottawa’s cash, of course, is something no Bloc Québecois MP will ever get to do. Only those MPs on the government benches get to do that — a point that the Liberal MP travelling to the Saguenay, Claude Guay, is most likely to mention to Chicoutimi’s voters.
David Akin is the chief political correspondent for Global News.
Sounds treasonous, or maybe corrupt, but not good.
I voted cor the Elbows Up guy.Saw him in a couple of those Austin Powers movies.I figured with Trump trying to invade Canada, we could use a few laughs.I always vote Liberal. 3 times for the young fella with the pretty hair.Justin was his name.
Anyways, dont know much about this Carney guy,I guess he’s the Liberals spokesperson. Talks a lot,that about it but at least the Prime Minister is hard at work.
Well at least for once we have openness and transparency.
Carney is abusing our democracy by not calling all 4 by-elections at once. He is using the abuse of our democracy as a means to keep his majority. Just as he manipulated a majority by coercing or buying floor crossings from the Conservatives and NDP. Canadians should be outraged at how our system is being manipulated for power and control, and definitely not in the best interest of Canada or Canadians.
So some Canadians have to go without representation in parliament because Carney is afraid he may lose a seat. Carney is only concerned about staying in power in anyway he can and not about Canadians.
Pretty obvious his majority right now is very thin if the Libs loose theses elections it could put them in danger of a no confidence vote and be forced to call a general election. By not calling the 4 vote he can at least hold on to power for a little longer at worst.
So Carney does right for the Liberals, not Canadians at all.
But Elbows Up Canada eh?
Keep fearing the USA instead.
Pearl clutching would be out by the CBC if Harper did something similar. As it is their paymaster doing it, they have no problem with it.
Canadians richly deserve the government they continue to re elect .
Carney gas been beyond disappointing!
This ought to be illegal.
Carney has been a disappointment on multiple levels since becoming PM last March. His major promises have not been kept.
WHY ?
Because Carney is running scared 16 months of doing nothing since he became PM has to have even the most ardent Liberals questioning their choice.
A majority klepto-socialist government that wasn’t elected isn’t good news for the people that pay the taxes for the LPC’s taxpayer funded “free” stuff voter base’s “free” stuff.
Carney doesn’t do what is right for Canada, only himself. Why should a seat stay empty needlessly for another 6 months. Carney only acts for his own cynical gain.
So it is mainly about politics and advancing the Liberal message, with citizen representation trailing in the rear. Really shows where the Liberal focus and priorities are.
He’s a coward.