There are no clear answers on whether federal politicians accused of “wittingly” colluding with foreign states could run in the next election.
A stunning report by the federal national security committee of parliamentarians Monday revealed that multiple federal politicians allegedly knowingly participated in foreign interference schemes over the last five years.
That’s spurring concerns about whether those individuals should be named, removed from their current positions or roles and barred from running again in the next election, as the Liberal government continues to refuse to reveal their identities.
The chair of the committee, Liberal MP David McGuinty, said he is not in a position to say whether those as-yet unidentified politicians will be allowed to run under their parties’ banners.
McGuinty said the members of the committee of parliamentarians — which includes representation from all parties, as well as senators — are bound by Canada’s official secrets law.
“That means if they inadvertently reveal information, they can be prosecuted…. The committee’s hands are tied,” McGuinty said on his way to the Liberal caucus meeting Wednesday.
By law, the Liberals must call an election by October 2025.
It’s unclear if the identities of the alleged colluders will be revealed by then — if they will be permitted to stand for re-election, or if they are sitting MPs now.
But the report has set off a wave of speculation and concern in the halls of Parliament with the New Democrats, Bloc Québécois and Conservatices demanding action.
Get breaking National news
The NSICOP report released Monday described several activities involving parliamentarians allegedly collaborating with foreign countries, including revealing state secrets and accepting money or favours from diplomats.
In one of the most serious examples, a parliamentarian allegedly passed on confidential government information to a “known intelligence officer of a foreign state.”
Who is calling for names to be released?
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre says he wants the Liberals to reveal the identities of federal politicians referenced in the report.
“The national security committee indicates there are members of this House that have knowingly worked for foreign hostile governments. Canadians have a right to know who,” said Poilievre.
- Loonie’s plunge just one consequence of Trump tariff threat on your wallet
- Canada Post says it missed delivering nearly 10M parcels amid strike
- N.S. election: Results could be delayed after voting station opens late near Halifax
- Will Canada’s tax ‘holiday’ create a ‘mess’ for businesses? Some say yes
Conservative MP Michael Chong, whose own family was targeted by Beijing, also wants the government to lift the veil of secrecy.
“I can’t believe the following needs to be said. Parliamentarians’ duty is not to a foreign state but to the people of Canada,” he said during Wednesday’s question period. “Will the prime minister release the names of these parliamentarians?”
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was not in the House. He travelled to Normandy ahead of the 80th anniversary of D-Day.
But Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc, who oversees the foreign interference file, responded to the Conservatives’ criticism saying “no government” would discuss the “particularities of intelligence information publicly.”
However, LeBlanc dodged reporters’ questions earlier on his way into caucus.
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said he wants action, but stopped short of asking the government to reveal the identities of alleged colluders.
“There should be an investigation,” said Singh. “If it is true, they’re held accountable.”
But some Liberals went a step further. “If someone has actively co-operated … who had a relationship with a foreign agent, that person should be named in the shorter term and fuller allegations should be laid out and we should have due process,” Toronto Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith said.
Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said Tuesday that there will be an internal followup on the allegations outlined in the report but did not explain what that “followup” would look like.
Freeland refused to take questions about the matter Wednesday.
After the release of the NSICOP report, LeBlanc said he disagreed with certain elements of it but would not say what he found problematic, citing national security concerns.
McGuinty did not address questions about LeBlanc’s criticism over the committee’s report but said the public safety minister has reached out to MPs asking them “to consider getting briefed by the sergeant-at-arms in terms of what foreign interference is.”
The National Security and Intelligence Committee has been chaired by McGuinty since its creation in 2018.
Unlike in other Five Eyes countries, the committee does not report to Parliament but instead reports directly to the prime minister, whose office can redact elements of its reports that officials believe could risk national security before they are made public.
The Five Eyes is an intelligence alliance made up of Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Australia and New Zealand.
— with files from Alex Boutilier
Comments