Advertisement

Supreme Court upholds First Nation election requirement

The Supreme Court of Canada is seen, Friday, June 16, 2023 in Ottawa. The Supreme Court is upholding a First Nations election requirement. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

The Supreme Court of Canada is upholding a rule that requires members of a Yukon First Nation to live in its community should they want to serve on its council.

Cindy Dickson had been fighting in the courts to have that requirement declared unconstitutional because it means council members must move back to the community within 14 days of winning a seat.

Living about 800 kilometres away from Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, Dickson was unable to move to Old Crow if elected because her son requires access to medical care not available in the community.

The self-governing First Nation’s rule, however, was found by the majority of the court to constitute a specific government activity, and the court ruled that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms applies.

Click to play video: 'Protecting and revitalizing Indigenous languages'
Protecting and revitalizing Indigenous languages

The court found that while the Aboriginal and treaty rights laid out in Section 25 of the Charter apply, so too do the individual rights in Section 15.

Story continues below advertisement

But the court ruled that Section 25 prevails.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

“Tied to ancient practices of government that connect leadership of the VGFN community to the settlement land, the residency requirement protects Indigenous difference and, pursuant to (Section 25), cannot be abrogated or derogated from by Ms. Dickson’s individual Charter right with which it is in irreconcilable conflict,” the majority decision reads.

“Section 25 protects the collective Indigenous interest when the conflict is not hypothetical and cannot be avoided.”

Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, which has its own constitution, had argued the Charter does not apply to the community. And if it were subject to the Charter, the community argued its election rule didn’t violate Dickson’s individual rights.

The Court disagreed with the First Nation’s cross-appeal, saying the Charter does apply to it under Section 32.

Sponsored content

AdChoices