Advertisement

Jury in Peter Nygard trial asks judge how to proceed if they can’t agree on a count

Click to play video: 'Closing submissions at Peter Nygard sex assault trial Tuesday'
Closing submissions at Peter Nygard sex assault trial Tuesday
RELATED: On Tuesday, lawyers in the Peter Nygard trial made their closing submissions. As Catherine McDonald reports, the crown called Nygard’s memory selective and said he is guilty. The defence argued the prosecution falsely painted a picture of an evil predator – Nov 7, 2023

TORONTO — The judge in Peter Nygard’s sexual assault trial is urging the jury to keep deliberating after they asked how to proceed if they can’t reach a unanimous decision on one of the counts.

The jury, which has been deliberating since late Wednesday afternoon, also asked the judge Friday evening to define a “significant” amount of time as it relates to unlawful confinement.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Justice Robert Goldstein told them that, in this case, a significant period of time means it’s more than momentary and “appreciable,” with no minimum requirement.

Nygard, the 82-year-old founder of a now-defunct women’s fashion company, has pleaded not guilty to five counts of sexual assault and one count of forcible confinement in alleged incidents ranging from the 1980s to mid-2000s.

Five complainants have testified that they were invited to Nygard’s Toronto headquarters under pretences ranging from tours to job interviews, with all encounters ending in a top-floor bedroom suite where they alleged they were sexually assaulted.

Story continues below advertisement

Nygard testified in his own defence and denied all five of the women’s allegations, saying he didn’t recall meeting or interacting with four of them.

The judge told the jury on Friday that they should keep deliberating with an open mind in order to reach a unanimous decision on all counts.

Sponsored content

AdChoices