OTTAWA – Canada’s auditor general has warned the navy may not get as many or the kind of ships it needs because of the Harper government’s budget inflexibility and lack of homework.
Michael Ferguson‘s latest report examines the National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy and the first few projects already in the queue, but still in the planning stages.
The budgets for the planned replacements of the country’s frigates and the Conservatives’ signature Arctic patrol ship program have not been revised or increased in over half a decade, despite rising labour and material costs.
As a result, Ferguson says, it’s unclear how many ships the strategy will produce and with such hard cost ceilings in place, the navy could be forced to reduce the fleet size below its needs.
The audit points out that in order to stay within budget, the navy has made capability trade-offs on both the Arctic patrol ships and planned replacements for military supply ships.
Ferguson says the 30-year, $34-billion strategy requires close monitoring but also budget flexibility.
“While budgets are a useful control, Canada may not get the military ships it needs if budgets are not subject to change,” Ferguson wrote.
The Conservatives have tended to treat “rough estimates” as budget caps, the auditor said.
The budgets for the Arctic patrol ships and the Canadian surface combatants, meant to replace the frigates, have not been adjusted since 2007-08, and according to National Defence “there have been significant increases in cost elements, which are impairing the affordability of the military ships.”
The auditor took a swipe at the Harper government for not having a clearer defence policy, echoing critics.
“While the (Canada First Defence Strategy) did outline the expected number of navy ships and the core missions for the Canadian Forces, it did not define the specific naval capabilities required to fulfil the government’s level of ambition.”
“In our opinion, a gap appears to be developing between the (Canada First Defence Strategy) level of ambition, the evolving naval capabilities, and the budget. National Defence should continue to monitor the extent to which it will or will not meet the government’s expectations for future military needs, and continue to report to ministers on expected capability gaps, allowing the government to make adjustments to expectations and capabilities.”
The national shipbuilding strategy, signed October 2011, selected two shipyards as preferred builders for the federal government – one in Halifax for combat ships, the other in Vancouver for smaller civilian-grade vessels.
With that overall agreement signed, it is left up to federal officials to negotiate each ship-construction contract individually.
Ferguson found the overall strategy was reasonably well executed, but complained about how the federal government was drawn into backstopping the cost of infrastructure upgrades at the two preferred yards.
Both the Irving-owned Halifax Shipyards and Seaspan in Vancouver bid on the exclusive arrangement, saying upgrades to their facilities would be at “$0 net cost to Canada.”
But after the deals were signed, they raised concerns they would be shouldering the burden without a guarantee that federal government would build as many ships as promised.
The Irving Shipyard requires $300 million in upgrades, while the B.C. company is aiming for $200 million.
Ferguson warned the federal government could be on the hook for some of that extra cost if it doesn’t order the number of ships it promised.
The intent of the strategy was to avoid the boom-and-bust cycles that have characterized shipbuilding in Canada for more than two decades.
The auditor says the strategy has secured the future of the Halifax yard for a generation because of the navy’s combat needs, but Vancouver may only have as few as seven years of guaranteed work.